conversation_id
int64 1
206k
| help_channel
stringlengths 6
7
| __rowid__
stringlengths 32
32
| author_id
int64 62,061,868B
1,071,443,446B
| author_name
stringlengths 2
32
| timestamp
stringlengths 19
19
| content
stringlengths 0
3.97k
| reference.messageId
stringclasses 3
values | reference.channelId
stringclasses 3
values | reference.guildId
stringclasses 1
value | url
stringlengths 0
591
| fileName
stringlengths 0
513
| student
int64 0
1
| helper
int64 0
1
| references.id
float64 62,061,868B
1,071,056,124B
⌀ | references.name
stringlengths 2
32
⌀ | references.discriminator
stringlengths 4
4
⌀ | references.nickname
stringlengths 1
32
⌀ | references.isBot
bool 2
classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
205,788 |
help-1
|
b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4
| 510,789,298,321,096,700 |
TeXit
|
01/30/2022 22:32:46
|
**Camilleone**
|
569167697925898261.png
| 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
||||
205,788 |
help-1
|
b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4
| 709,959,727,098,101,800 |
beeswax
|
01/30/2022 22:33:28
|
Oh, right. So then P(n+1) is If $b_1 + \dots + b_m \leq (n+1)$, then $b_1!\dots b_m! \leq (n+1)!$?
| 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,788 |
help-1
|
b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4
| 510,789,298,321,096,700 |
TeXit
|
01/30/2022 22:33:30
|
**beeswax**
|
709959727098101810.png
| 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
||||
205,788 |
help-1
|
b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4
| 569,167,697,925,898,240 |
Camilleone
|
01/30/2022 22:33:42
|
yes
| 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,788 |
help-1
|
b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4
| 709,959,727,098,101,800 |
beeswax
|
01/30/2022 22:34:55
|
Wait, so then my inductive hypothesis is only $$b_1 + \dots + b_m \leq (n+1)!$$
| 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,788 |
help-1
|
b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4
| 510,789,298,321,096,700 |
TeXit
|
01/30/2022 22:34:57
|
**beeswax**
|
709959727098101810.png
| 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
||||
205,788 |
help-1
|
b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4
| 569,167,697,925,898,240 |
Camilleone
|
01/30/2022 22:37:02
|
your inductive hypothesis is P(n)
| 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,788 |
help-1
|
b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4
| 569,167,697,925,898,240 |
Camilleone
|
01/30/2022 22:37:15
|
that is: If $b_1 + ... + b_m \leq n$, then $b_1! \cdots b_m! \leq n!$
| 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,788 |
help-1
|
b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4
| 510,789,298,321,096,700 |
TeXit
|
01/30/2022 22:37:18
|
**Camilleone**
|
569167697925898261.png
| 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
||||
205,788 |
help-1
|
b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4
| 569,167,697,925,898,240 |
Camilleone
|
01/30/2022 22:37:28
|
this is your inductive hypothesis
| 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,788 |
help-1
|
b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4
| 569,167,697,925,898,240 |
Camilleone
|
01/30/2022 22:38:04
|
now you need to prove: if $b_1 + \dots + b_m \leq (n+1)$, then $b_1! \dots b_m! \leq (n+1)!$
| 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,788 |
help-1
|
b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4
| 510,789,298,321,096,700 |
TeXit
|
01/30/2022 22:38:06
|
**Camilleone**
|
569167697925898261.png
| 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
||||
205,788 |
help-1
|
b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4
| 709,959,727,098,101,800 |
beeswax
|
01/30/2022 22:39:07
|
Oh, so this is good so far then
|
image.png
| 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
||||
205,788 |
help-1
|
b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4
| 569,167,697,925,898,240 |
Camilleone
|
01/30/2022 22:39:29
|
i would find some issue with the first line's second half tbh
| 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,788 |
help-1
|
b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4
| 569,167,697,925,898,240 |
Camilleone
|
01/30/2022 22:39:47
|
first green line i mean
| 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,788 |
help-1
|
b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4
| 569,167,697,925,898,240 |
Camilleone
|
01/30/2022 22:40:21
|
and i have no idea where you learned the phrasing of the last two lines, but that is _not_ how you write induction
| 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,788 |
help-1
|
b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4
| 709,959,727,098,101,800 |
beeswax
|
01/30/2022 22:40:30
|
Oh yeah, I'll delete that right hand side of the "and"
| 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,788 |
help-1
|
b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4
| 569,167,697,925,898,240 |
Camilleone
|
01/30/2022 22:40:46
|
isn't that what you want to show? why are you assuming it?
| 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,788 |
help-1
|
b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4
| 709,959,727,098,101,800 |
beeswax
|
01/30/2022 22:41:54
|
I thought that was our inductive hypothesis?
| 0 | 1 | 331,558,346,333,224,960 |
jan Niku
|
2119
|
jan Niku
| false |
|||||
205,788 |
help-1
|
b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4
| 709,959,727,098,101,800 |
beeswax
|
01/30/2022 22:42:24
|
We use P(n) to prove P(n+1)?
| 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,788 |
help-1
|
b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4
| 569,167,697,925,898,240 |
Camilleone
|
01/30/2022 22:43:19
|
do you want to read those lines again
| 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,788 |
help-1
|
b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4
| 569,167,697,925,898,240 |
Camilleone
|
01/30/2022 22:43:28
|
this is what we want to do
| 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,788 |
help-1
|
b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4
| 569,167,697,925,898,240 |
Camilleone
|
01/30/2022 22:43:39
|
the inductive hypothesis is only P(n)
| 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,788 |
help-1
|
b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4
| 569,167,697,925,898,240 |
Camilleone
|
01/30/2022 22:43:59
|
which means the only assumption is P(n) _for some n_, and we want to use this to show P(n+1) is true
| 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,788 |
help-1
|
b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4
| 569,167,697,925,898,240 |
Camilleone
|
01/30/2022 22:44:08
|
we cannot just assume P(n) is true for all n
| 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,788 |
help-1
|
b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4
| 709,959,727,098,101,800 |
beeswax
|
01/30/2022 22:45:10
|
So, it was just an issue with the "for all" part?
| 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,788 |
help-1
|
b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4
| 569,167,697,925,898,240 |
Camilleone
|
01/30/2022 22:47:24
|
yes
| 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,788 |
help-1
|
b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4
| 569,167,697,925,898,240 |
Camilleone
|
01/30/2022 22:47:34
|
for all and for some are two very different things
| 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,788 |
help-1
|
b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4
| 709,959,727,098,101,800 |
beeswax
|
01/30/2022 22:51:12
|
Oh, okay. So, are we pretty much just using $n \leq (n+1)$ and $n! \leq (n+1)!$ here?
| 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,788 |
help-1
|
b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4
| 510,789,298,321,096,700 |
TeXit
|
01/30/2022 22:51:15
|
**beeswax**
|
709959727098101810.png
| 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
||||
205,788 |
help-1
|
b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4
| 709,959,727,098,101,800 |
beeswax
|
01/30/2022 22:51:20
|
In the inductive case I mean
| 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,788 |
help-1
|
b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4
| 569,167,697,925,898,240 |
Camilleone
|
01/30/2022 22:51:40
|
maybe you should try the induction first
| 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,788 |
help-1
|
b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4
| 569,167,697,925,898,240 |
Camilleone
|
01/30/2022 22:51:42
|
see what happens
| 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,788 |
help-1
|
b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4
| 709,959,727,098,101,800 |
beeswax
|
01/30/2022 23:03:49
|
Mkay, so I did this and I'm not quite sure what I have at my disposal to get that what I have implies that factorial product inequality for (n+1)!
| 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,788 |
help-1
|
b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4
| 709,959,727,098,101,800 |
beeswax
|
01/30/2022 23:03:54
|
image.png
| 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,788 |
help-1
|
b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4
| 709,959,727,098,101,800 |
beeswax
|
01/30/2022 23:13:03
|
There's no time limit for these help channels, right? I'm just going to get some food real quick
| 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,788 |
help-1
|
b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4
| 569,167,697,925,898,240 |
Camilleone
|
01/30/2022 23:20:25
|
Well, there's a sort of time limit that's dependent on when the bot asks you if the question is resolved
| 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,788 |
help-1
|
b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4
| 569,167,697,925,898,240 |
Camilleone
|
01/30/2022 23:20:31
|
Otherwise no
| 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,788 |
help-1
|
b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4
| 569,167,697,925,898,240 |
Camilleone
|
01/30/2022 23:21:06
|
About the latest picture: you don't need to say m is fixed again
| 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,788 |
help-1
|
b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4
| 569,167,697,925,898,240 |
Camilleone
|
01/30/2022 23:21:16
|
Cause you fixed it at the start
| 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,788 |
help-1
|
b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4
| 569,167,697,925,898,240 |
Camilleone
|
01/30/2022 23:22:12
|
You should begin by letting b_1,...,b_m be positive integers such that b_1 + ... + b_m \leq n+1
| 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,788 |
help-1
|
b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4
| 569,167,697,925,898,240 |
Camilleone
|
01/30/2022 23:22:37
|
And then now consider the product of the factorials
| 0 | 1 | 214,305,946,090,995,700 |
Dzoni
|
0850
|
Dzoni
| false |
|||||
205,788 |
help-1
|
b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4
| 569,167,697,925,898,240 |
Camilleone
|
01/30/2022 23:22:43
|
^ continue from there
| 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,788 |
help-1
|
b6502d37dc67407db5152902f63ce8c4
| 709,959,727,098,101,800 |
beeswax
|
01/31/2022 00:13:07
|
Ah, I think I might see where it’s going.
| 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,789 |
help-1
|
7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c
| 456,226,577,798,135,800 |
Deleted User
|
01/31/2022 01:17:14
|
unknown.png
| 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,789 |
help-1
|
7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c
| 652,336,711,325,712,400 |
quantum
|
01/31/2022 01:17:56
|
u sub
| 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,789 |
help-1
|
7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c
| 456,226,577,798,135,800 |
Deleted User
|
01/31/2022 01:18:04
|
yeah im just stuck rn
| 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,789 |
help-1
|
7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c
| 456,226,577,798,135,800 |
Deleted User
|
01/31/2022 01:18:10
|
let me know if this is right so far
| 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,789 |
help-1
|
7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c
| 456,226,577,798,135,800 |
Deleted User
|
01/31/2022 01:18:47
|
unknown.png
| 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,789 |
help-1
|
7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c
| 652,336,711,325,712,400 |
quantum
|
01/31/2022 01:19:01
|
good so far
| 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,789 |
help-1
|
7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c
| 456,226,577,798,135,800 |
Deleted User
|
01/31/2022 01:19:18
|
now i dont know what to multiply to get 1/2radicalx
| 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,789 |
help-1
|
7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c
| 652,336,711,325,712,400 |
quantum
|
01/31/2022 01:21:14
|
idk what you mean
| 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,789 |
help-1
|
7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c
| 652,336,711,325,712,400 |
quantum
|
01/31/2022 01:21:24
|
just multiply both sides by 2
| 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,789 |
help-1
|
7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c
| 652,336,711,325,712,400 |
quantum
|
01/31/2022 01:21:35
|
to get 2du = 1/sqrt(x)
| 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,789 |
help-1
|
7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c
| 456,226,577,798,135,800 |
Deleted User
|
01/31/2022 01:22:54
|
im still confused
| 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,789 |
help-1
|
7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c
| 652,336,711,325,712,400 |
quantum
|
01/31/2022 01:23:18
|
what’s confusing you
| 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,789 |
help-1
|
7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c
| 456,226,577,798,135,800 |
Deleted User
|
01/31/2022 01:23:50
|
what would 2du help me with
| 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,789 |
help-1
|
7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c
| 652,336,711,325,712,400 |
quantum
|
01/31/2022 01:24:42
|
it would tell you what 1/sqrt(x) is equal to
| 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,789 |
help-1
|
7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c
| 652,336,711,325,712,400 |
quantum
|
01/31/2022 01:24:48
|
so you can sub it back into the integral
| 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,789 |
help-1
|
7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c
| 652,336,711,325,712,400 |
quantum
|
01/31/2022 01:24:53
|
this is how u sub works
| 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,789 |
help-1
|
7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c
| 456,226,577,798,135,800 |
Deleted User
|
01/31/2022 01:25:03
|
unknown.png
| 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,789 |
help-1
|
7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c
| 456,226,577,798,135,800 |
Deleted User
|
01/31/2022 01:25:27
|
yes but would i not need to get something on the outside like this problem?
| 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,789 |
help-1
|
7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c
| 456,226,577,798,135,800 |
Deleted User
|
01/31/2022 01:25:31
|
the 1/3
| 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,789 |
help-1
|
7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c
| 652,336,711,325,712,400 |
quantum
|
01/31/2022 01:25:42
|
that works too
| 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,789 |
help-1
|
7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c
| 456,226,577,798,135,800 |
Deleted User
|
01/31/2022 01:26:09
|
would you mind running me through it and then explaining it?
| 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,789 |
help-1
|
7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c
| 652,336,711,325,712,400 |
quantum
|
01/31/2022 01:27:26
|
sure
| 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,789 |
help-1
|
7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c
| 652,336,711,325,712,400 |
quantum
|
01/31/2022 01:27:34
|
so you already have the u sub
| 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,789 |
help-1
|
7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c
| 652,336,711,325,712,400 |
quantum
|
01/31/2022 01:27:53
|
du = 1/(2sqrt(x)) dx
| 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,789 |
help-1
|
7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c
| 652,336,711,325,712,400 |
quantum
|
01/31/2022 01:28:06
|
2du = 1/sqrt(x) dx
| 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,789 |
help-1
|
7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c
| 652,336,711,325,712,400 |
quantum
|
01/31/2022 01:28:11
|
u = sqrt(x)
| 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,789 |
help-1
|
7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c
| 652,336,711,325,712,400 |
quantum
|
01/31/2022 01:28:25
|
so we can just sub this back into the original integral to get
| 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,789 |
help-1
|
7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c
| 652,336,711,325,712,400 |
quantum
|
01/31/2022 01:28:36
|
2sin(u) du
| 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,789 |
help-1
|
7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c
| 456,226,577,798,135,800 |
Deleted User
|
01/31/2022 01:29:16
|
and then i just derive from there right?
| 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,789 |
help-1
|
7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c
| 652,336,711,325,712,400 |
quantum
|
01/31/2022 01:29:59
|
integrate but yes
| 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,789 |
help-1
|
7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c
| 456,226,577,798,135,800 |
Deleted User
|
01/31/2022 01:30:23
|
unknown.png
| 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,789 |
help-1
|
7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c
| 456,226,577,798,135,800 |
Deleted User
|
01/31/2022 01:30:36
|
thats it right
| 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,789 |
help-1
|
7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c
| 652,336,711,325,712,400 |
quantum
|
01/31/2022 01:30:37
|
yeah
| 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,789 |
help-1
|
7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c
| 652,336,711,325,712,400 |
quantum
|
01/31/2022 01:31:06
|
,w d/dx (-2cos(sqrt(x)))
| 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,789 |
help-1
|
7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c
| 510,789,298,321,096,700 |
TeXit
|
01/31/2022 01:31:11
|
Results provided by WolframAlpha
| 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,789 |
help-1
|
7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c
| 652,336,711,325,712,400 |
quantum
|
01/31/2022 01:31:12
|
just to check
| 0 | 1 | 214,305,946,090,995,700 |
Dzoni
|
0850
|
Dzoni
| false |
|||||
205,789 |
help-1
|
7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c
| 456,226,577,798,135,800 |
Deleted User
|
01/31/2022 01:32:22
|
can i run you by some more problems?
| 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,789 |
help-1
|
7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c
| 652,336,711,325,712,400 |
quantum
|
01/31/2022 01:32:47
|
sure
| 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,789 |
help-1
|
7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c
| 456,226,577,798,135,800 |
Deleted User
|
01/31/2022 01:33:49
|
unknown.png
| 1 | 0 | 183,668,144,404,037,630 |
Ann
|
0413
|
Ann
| false |
|||||
205,789 |
help-1
|
7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c
| 456,226,577,798,135,800 |
Deleted User
|
01/31/2022 01:33:55
|
i know i prolly already messed up
| 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,789 |
help-1
|
7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c
| 456,226,577,798,135,800 |
Deleted User
|
01/31/2022 01:34:19
|
is u sqrt(1-x)
| 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,789 |
help-1
|
7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c
| 652,336,711,325,712,400 |
quantum
|
01/31/2022 01:34:30
|
you didn’t exactly mess up
| 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,789 |
help-1
|
7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c
| 652,336,711,325,712,400 |
quantum
|
01/31/2022 01:34:38
|
but you should solve for x in terms of u
| 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,789 |
help-1
|
7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c
| 652,336,711,325,712,400 |
quantum
|
01/31/2022 01:35:00
|
so you can avoid integration by parts
| 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,789 |
help-1
|
7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c
| 652,336,711,325,712,400 |
quantum
|
01/31/2022 01:35:07
|
even though it’s not that bad anyways
| 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,789 |
help-1
|
7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c
| 456,226,577,798,135,800 |
Deleted User
|
01/31/2022 01:37:00
|
does this look right?
| 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,789 |
help-1
|
7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c
| 456,226,577,798,135,800 |
Deleted User
|
01/31/2022 01:38:54
|
i already think i forgot something but i dont know how i would go about doing it
| 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,789 |
help-1
|
7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c
| 456,226,577,798,135,800 |
Deleted User
|
01/31/2022 02:03:23
|
@Helpers
| 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,789 |
help-1
|
7304d3cd2f1445b6b37ef449fa4b886c
| 456,226,577,798,135,800 |
Deleted User
|
01/31/2022 02:14:31
|
.close
| 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,790 |
help-1
|
09b779efeeae4d199c34c9253aa917f4
| 898,441,976,142,237,800 |
Hyperlix
|
01/31/2022 02:19:09
|
how do you graph x + y = 7?
| 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,790 |
help-1
|
09b779efeeae4d199c34c9253aa917f4
| 353,366,222,450,065,400 |
TheWhiteShadow
|
01/31/2022 02:23:12
|
it's an equation with a y-int of 7 and a gradient of -1
| 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,790 |
help-1
|
09b779efeeae4d199c34c9253aa917f4
| 898,441,976,142,237,800 |
Hyperlix
|
01/31/2022 02:23:47
|
how did you get the gradient?
| 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,790 |
help-1
|
09b779efeeae4d199c34c9253aa917f4
| 929,724,109,011,681,300 |
RDT
|
01/31/2022 02:24:13
|
take x=0 , u get y=7
take y=0 , u get x=7
so line passes through 0,7 and 7,0
connect the points u get a line
| 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,790 |
help-1
|
09b779efeeae4d199c34c9253aa917f4
| 898,441,976,142,237,800 |
Hyperlix
|
01/31/2022 02:24:52
|
ahhh
| 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,790 |
help-1
|
09b779efeeae4d199c34c9253aa917f4
| 898,441,976,142,237,800 |
Hyperlix
|
01/31/2022 02:24:57
|
ok
| 1 | 0 | null | null | null | null | null |
|||||
205,790 |
help-1
|
09b779efeeae4d199c34c9253aa917f4
| 353,366,222,450,065,400 |
TheWhiteShadow
|
01/31/2022 02:25:18
|
cuz x is multiplied by -1
| 0 | 1 | null | null | null | null | null |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.