Task
int64 1
6
| Subtask
int64 1
18
| VolumeName
stringlengths 18
22
| Question
stringlengths 18
296
| Answer
stringlengths 2
112
| QuestionType
stringclasses 2
values | AnswerChoice
stringclasses 5
values | Choice A
stringclasses 3
values | Choice B
stringclasses 3
values | Choice C
stringclasses 2
values | Choice D
stringclasses 2
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6 | 7 |
train_14442_i_1.nii.gz
|
coronary artery wall calcification had: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] in earlier scans. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion state from timeline and CT. What is the current CT assessment of coronary artery wall calcification based on prior sequences?
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
Close
|
D
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_14442_i_1.nii.gz
|
cardiomegaly condition history: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion judged by sequences and scan. How has cardiomegaly evolved from earlier scan sequences to now?
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
Close
|
D
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_14442_i_1.nii.gz
|
pulmonary fibrotic sequela had: [1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] in earlier scans. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Final label from history and CT. Given its sequence history, what is pulmonary fibrotic sequela in the current CT?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_14442_i_1.nii.gz
|
Scans showed bronchiectasis as: [0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) History and CT decide lesion category. Based on the temporal sequence, what is the present status of bronchiectasis?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_14442_i_1.nii.gz
|
Recorded sequences for lymphadenopathy: [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion behavior from past to CT. What is the current status of lymphadenopathy based on previous sequences?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_14442_i_1.nii.gz
|
consolidation progression: [0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Multi-phase sequences guide CT-based judgment. What lesion category applies to consolidation in the current CT?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_18130_i_1.nii.gz
|
Prior emphysema timeline: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion judged by sequences and scan. How has emphysema evolved from earlier scan sequences to now?
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
Close
|
D
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_18130_i_1.nii.gz
|
Old sequences for consolidation: [0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Diagnosis combines sequence history and CT. What does consolidation currently represent, based on past sequences?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_18130_i_1.nii.gz
|
Earlier arterial wall calcification sequences: [0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT status follows sequence progression. How has arterial wall calcification changed from past sequences to the current CT?
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Close
|
A
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_18130_i_1.nii.gz
|
cardiomegaly condition history: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Stage-wise sequences + current CT = status. From prior sequences to now, what is the CT-based status of cardiomegaly?
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
Close
|
D
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_18130_i_1.nii.gz
|
Previous pericardial effusion states: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion behavior from past to CT. What is the current status of pericardial effusion based on previous sequences?
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Close
|
A
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_18130_i_1.nii.gz
|
hiatal hernia trend was: [1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) From multi-stage sequences and present CT. What type of lesion is hiatal hernia now, given its temporal sequence?
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Close
|
A
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_18130_i_1.nii.gz
|
Earlier CTs showed lymphadenopathy as: [0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Final label from history and CT. Given its sequence history, what is lymphadenopathy in the current CT?
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Close
|
A
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_18130_i_1.nii.gz
|
Earlier lung nodule sequences: [0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion state from timeline and CT. What is the current CT assessment of lung nodule based on prior sequences?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_18130_i_1.nii.gz
|
interlobular septal thickening had: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] in earlier scans. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence trend plus current CT defines status. What does the current CT show about interlobular septal thickening based on earlier sequences?
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
Close
|
C
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_18130_i_1.nii.gz
|
pulmonary fibrotic sequela had: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] in earlier scans. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Classification uses sequences and current image. How has pulmonary fibrotic sequela progressed according to its temporal sequence?
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
Close
|
D
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_18130_i_1.nii.gz
|
Sequence history for mosaic attenuation pattern: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion state from timeline and CT. What is the current CT assessment of mosaic attenuation pattern based on prior sequences?
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
Close
|
D
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_18130_i_1.nii.gz
|
Previous peribronchial thickening states: [0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Based on sequence history and current CT. How does peribronchial thickening appear now compared to its sequence history?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_18130_i_1.nii.gz
|
Historical atelectasis status: [0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT reflects pattern of prior sequences. From sequence history to now, what best describes atelectasis?
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Close
|
A
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_18130_i_1.nii.gz
|
In past, bronchiectasis was: [0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Multi-phase sequences guide CT-based judgment. What lesion category applies to bronchiectasis in the current CT?
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Close
|
A
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_18130_i_1.nii.gz
|
Before now, lung opacity showed [0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence evolution and CT define outcome. What does the CT show for lung opacity considering its sequence history?
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Close
|
A
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_18130_i_1.nii.gz
|
Prior pleural effusion timeline: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion behavior from past to CT. What is the current status of pleural effusion based on previous sequences?
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
Close
|
C
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_18130_i_1.nii.gz
|
Old sequences for coronary artery wall calcification: [0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence trend plus current CT defines status. What does the current CT show about coronary artery wall calcification based on earlier sequences?
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Close
|
A
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_5428_i_1.nii.gz
|
arterial wall calcification trend was: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Based on sequence history and current CT. How does arterial wall calcification appear now compared to its sequence history?
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
Close
|
D
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_5428_i_1.nii.gz
|
bronchiectasis sequence was: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion behavior from past to CT. What is the current status of bronchiectasis based on previous sequences?
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
Close
|
D
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_5428_i_1.nii.gz
|
Earlier consolidation sequences: [1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT status follows sequence progression. How has consolidation changed from past sequences to the current CT?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_5428_i_1.nii.gz
|
Past sequences of peribronchial thickening: [0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Past sequences and CT determine lesion type. Based on past sequences, what is the current condition of peribronchial thickening?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_5428_i_1.nii.gz
|
In past, mosaic attenuation pattern was: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT status follows sequence progression. How has mosaic attenuation pattern changed from past sequences to the current CT?
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
Close
|
D
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_5428_i_1.nii.gz
|
Scans showed pleural effusion as: [0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT confirms what sequences suggest. How is pleural effusion classified now using past sequence data?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_5428_i_1.nii.gz
|
pulmonary fibrotic sequela condition history: [1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Multi-phase sequences guide CT-based judgment. What lesion category applies to pulmonary fibrotic sequela in the current CT?
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Close
|
A
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_5428_i_1.nii.gz
|
Recorded sequences for lung opacity: [1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence evolution and CT define outcome. What does the CT show for lung opacity considering its sequence history?
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Close
|
A
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_5428_i_1.nii.gz
|
atelectasis over time: [0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Based on sequence history and current CT. How does atelectasis appear now compared to its sequence history?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_5428_i_1.nii.gz
|
Before now, hiatal hernia showed [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Past sequences and CT determine lesion type. Based on past sequences, what is the current condition of hiatal hernia?
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
Close
|
D
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_5428_i_1.nii.gz
|
Historical coronary artery wall calcification status: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT confirms what sequences suggest. How is coronary artery wall calcification classified now using past sequence data?
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
Close
|
D
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_5428_i_1.nii.gz
|
Prior interlobular septal thickening timeline: [0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) History and CT decide lesion category. Based on the temporal sequence, what is the present status of interlobular septal thickening?
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Close
|
A
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_5428_i_1.nii.gz
|
lung nodule progression: [1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Diagnosis combines sequence history and CT. What does lung nodule currently represent, based on past sequences?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_5428_i_1.nii.gz
|
Earlier CTs showed cardiomegaly as: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Diagnosis combines sequence history and CT. What does cardiomegaly currently represent, based on past sequences?
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
Close
|
D
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_5428_i_1.nii.gz
|
Prior pericardial effusion timeline: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion judged by sequences and scan. How has pericardial effusion evolved from earlier scan sequences to now?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_5428_i_1.nii.gz
|
Sequence history for emphysema: [0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion state from timeline and CT. What is the current CT assessment of emphysema based on prior sequences?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_5428_i_1.nii.gz
|
lymphadenopathy had: [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0] in earlier scans. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Classification uses sequences and current image. How has lymphadenopathy progressed according to its temporal sequence?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_6902_i_1.nii.gz
|
Prior atelectasis timeline: [1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT status follows sequence progression. How has atelectasis changed from past sequences to the current CT?
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Close
|
A
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_6902_i_1.nii.gz
|
lung nodule had: [1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0] in earlier scans. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion behavior from past to CT. What is the current status of lung nodule based on previous sequences?
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Close
|
A
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_6902_i_1.nii.gz
|
lung opacity sequence was: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Diagnosis combines sequence history and CT. What does lung opacity currently represent, based on past sequences?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_6902_i_1.nii.gz
|
arterial wall calcification sequence was: [1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Diagnosis combines sequence history and CT. What does arterial wall calcification currently represent, based on past sequences?
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Close
|
A
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_6902_i_1.nii.gz
|
In past, hiatal hernia was: [1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Based on sequence history and current CT. How does hiatal hernia appear now compared to its sequence history?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_6902_i_1.nii.gz
|
Prior lymphadenopathy timeline: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion judged by sequences and scan. How has lymphadenopathy evolved from earlier scan sequences to now?
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
Close
|
D
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_6902_i_1.nii.gz
|
emphysema condition history: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Past sequences and CT determine lesion type. Based on past sequences, what is the current condition of emphysema?
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Close
|
A
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_6902_i_1.nii.gz
|
Before now, cardiomegaly showed [1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion state from timeline and CT. What is the current CT assessment of cardiomegaly based on prior sequences?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_6902_i_1.nii.gz
|
Sequence history for pulmonary fibrotic sequela: [0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence trend plus current CT defines status. What does the current CT show about pulmonary fibrotic sequela based on earlier sequences?
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Close
|
A
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_6902_i_1.nii.gz
|
pleural effusion over time: [0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) From multi-stage sequences and present CT. What type of lesion is pleural effusion now, given its temporal sequence?
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Close
|
A
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_6902_i_1.nii.gz
|
peribronchial thickening condition history: [0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Past sequences and CT determine lesion type. Based on past sequences, what is the current condition of peribronchial thickening?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_6902_i_1.nii.gz
|
Prior consolidation timeline: [0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT status follows sequence progression. How has consolidation changed from past sequences to the current CT?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_6902_i_1.nii.gz
|
bronchiectasis had: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1] in earlier scans. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion behavior from past to CT. What is the current status of bronchiectasis based on previous sequences?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_6902_i_1.nii.gz
|
Sequence history for interlobular septal thickening: [1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence trend plus current CT defines status. What does the current CT show about interlobular septal thickening based on earlier sequences?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_6902_i_1.nii.gz
|
Recorded sequences for coronary artery wall calcification: [1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT confirms what sequences suggest. How is coronary artery wall calcification classified now using past sequence data?
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Close
|
A
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_6902_i_1.nii.gz
|
pericardial effusion condition history: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Stage-wise sequences + current CT = status. From prior sequences to now, what is the CT-based status of pericardial effusion?
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
Close
|
D
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_6902_i_1.nii.gz
|
Recorded sequences for mosaic attenuation pattern: [1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT confirms what sequences suggest. How is mosaic attenuation pattern classified now using past sequence data?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_7250_i_1.nii.gz
|
Earlier interlobular septal thickening sequences: [0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Diagnosis combines sequence history and CT. What does interlobular septal thickening currently represent, based on past sequences?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_7250_i_1.nii.gz
|
lymphadenopathy sequence was: [1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT reflects pattern of prior sequences. From sequence history to now, what best describes lymphadenopathy?
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Close
|
A
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_7250_i_1.nii.gz
|
In past, arterial wall calcification was: [1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Final label from history and CT. Given its sequence history, what is arterial wall calcification in the current CT?
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Close
|
A
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_7250_i_1.nii.gz
|
cardiomegaly trend was: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion behavior from past to CT. What is the current status of cardiomegaly based on previous sequences?
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
Close
|
D
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_7250_i_1.nii.gz
|
pericardial effusion had: [0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0] in earlier scans. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) History and CT decide lesion category. Based on the temporal sequence, what is the present status of pericardial effusion?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_7250_i_1.nii.gz
|
Sequence history for coronary artery wall calcification: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Stage-wise sequences + current CT = status. From prior sequences to now, what is the CT-based status of coronary artery wall calcification?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_7250_i_1.nii.gz
|
Earlier CTs showed hiatal hernia as: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence trend plus current CT defines status. What does the current CT show about hiatal hernia based on earlier sequences?
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
Close
|
D
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_7250_i_1.nii.gz
|
Recorded sequences for emphysema: [0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence evolution and CT define outcome. What does the CT show for emphysema considering its sequence history?
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Close
|
A
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_7250_i_1.nii.gz
|
Past sequences of bronchiectasis: [0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Based on sequence history and current CT. How does bronchiectasis appear now compared to its sequence history?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_7250_i_1.nii.gz
|
atelectasis condition history: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Multi-phase sequences guide CT-based judgment. What lesion category applies to atelectasis in the current CT?
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Close
|
A
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_7250_i_1.nii.gz
|
lung opacity had: [1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0] in earlier scans. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Stage-wise sequences + current CT = status. From prior sequences to now, what is the CT-based status of lung opacity?
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Close
|
A
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_7250_i_1.nii.gz
|
pulmonary fibrotic sequela over time: [1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion judged by sequences and scan. How has pulmonary fibrotic sequela evolved from earlier scan sequences to now?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_7250_i_1.nii.gz
|
pleural effusion progression: [0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Classification uses sequences and current image. How has pleural effusion progressed according to its temporal sequence?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_7250_i_1.nii.gz
|
Historical peribronchial thickening status: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) From multi-stage sequences and present CT. What type of lesion is peribronchial thickening now, given its temporal sequence?
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
Close
|
D
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_7250_i_1.nii.gz
|
Before now, consolidation showed [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Final label from history and CT. Given its sequence history, what is consolidation in the current CT?
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
Close
|
D
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_7250_i_1.nii.gz
|
Scans showed mosaic attenuation pattern as: [1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion state from timeline and CT. What is the current CT assessment of mosaic attenuation pattern based on prior sequences?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_7250_i_1.nii.gz
|
Prior lung nodule timeline: [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) History and CT decide lesion category. Based on the temporal sequence, what is the present status of lung nodule?
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Close
|
A
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_784_i_1.nii.gz
|
Before now, emphysema showed [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence trend plus current CT defines status. What does the current CT show about emphysema based on earlier sequences?
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Close
|
A
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_784_i_1.nii.gz
|
In past, lung nodule was: [1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) From multi-stage sequences and present CT. What type of lesion is lung nodule now, given its temporal sequence?
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Close
|
A
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_784_i_1.nii.gz
|
Recorded sequences for peribronchial thickening: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Based on sequence history and current CT. How does peribronchial thickening appear now compared to its sequence history?
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
Close
|
D
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_784_i_1.nii.gz
|
mosaic attenuation pattern sequence was: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion state from timeline and CT. What is the current CT assessment of mosaic attenuation pattern based on prior sequences?
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
Close
|
D
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_784_i_1.nii.gz
|
lung opacity sequence was: [1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Final label from history and CT. Given its sequence history, what is lung opacity in the current CT?
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Close
|
A
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_784_i_1.nii.gz
|
Historical hiatal hernia status: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion behavior from past to CT. What is the current status of hiatal hernia based on previous sequences?
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Close
|
A
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_784_i_1.nii.gz
|
Before now, atelectasis showed [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion judged by sequences and scan. How has atelectasis evolved from earlier scan sequences to now?
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
Close
|
D
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_784_i_1.nii.gz
|
cardiomegaly trend was: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Multi-phase sequences guide CT-based judgment. What lesion category applies to cardiomegaly in the current CT?
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
Close
|
D
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_784_i_1.nii.gz
|
In past, pleural effusion was: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Classification uses sequences and current image. How has pleural effusion progressed according to its temporal sequence?
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
Close
|
D
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_784_i_1.nii.gz
|
Sequence history for bronchiectasis: [0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence evolution and CT define outcome. What does the CT show for bronchiectasis considering its sequence history?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_784_i_1.nii.gz
|
Historical coronary artery wall calcification status: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Stage-wise sequences + current CT = status. From prior sequences to now, what is the CT-based status of coronary artery wall calcification?
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
Close
|
D
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_784_i_1.nii.gz
|
Earlier CTs showed pericardial effusion as: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) History and CT decide lesion category. Based on the temporal sequence, what is the present status of pericardial effusion?
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
Close
|
D
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_784_i_1.nii.gz
|
consolidation condition history: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Diagnosis combines sequence history and CT. What does consolidation currently represent, based on past sequences?
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
Close
|
D
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_784_i_1.nii.gz
|
Old sequences for arterial wall calcification: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Sequence evolution and CT define outcome. What does the CT show for arterial wall calcification considering its sequence history?
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
Close
|
D
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_784_i_1.nii.gz
|
Prior interlobular septal thickening timeline: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT confirms what sequences suggest. How is interlobular septal thickening classified now using past sequence data?
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
Close
|
D
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_784_i_1.nii.gz
|
Prior lymphadenopathy timeline: [1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Final label from history and CT. Given its sequence history, what is lymphadenopathy in the current CT?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_784_i_1.nii.gz
|
pulmonary fibrotic sequela had: [0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0, 0] in earlier scans. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT reflects pattern of prior sequences. From sequence history to now, what best describes pulmonary fibrotic sequela?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_848_i_1.nii.gz
|
Previous bronchiectasis states: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Based on sequence history and current CT. How does bronchiectasis appear now compared to its sequence history?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_848_i_1.nii.gz
|
lung nodule over time: [1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) History and CT decide lesion category. Based on the temporal sequence, what is the present status of lung nodule?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_848_i_1.nii.gz
|
Old sequences for interlobular septal thickening: [1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Diagnosis combines sequence history and CT. What does interlobular septal thickening currently represent, based on past sequences?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_848_i_1.nii.gz
|
Earlier consolidation sequences: [1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion state from timeline and CT. What is the current CT assessment of consolidation based on prior sequences?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_848_i_1.nii.gz
|
Scans showed pleural effusion as: [0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Lesion judged by sequences and scan. How has pleural effusion evolved from earlier scan sequences to now?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_848_i_1.nii.gz
|
Before now, pulmonary fibrotic sequela showed [1, 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) From multi-stage sequences and present CT. What type of lesion is pulmonary fibrotic sequela now, given its temporal sequence?
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Close
|
A
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_848_i_1.nii.gz
|
lung opacity progression: [1, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Stage-wise sequences + current CT = status. From prior sequences to now, what is the CT-based status of lung opacity?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_848_i_1.nii.gz
|
pericardial effusion condition history: [0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) CT status follows sequence progression. How has pericardial effusion changed from past sequences to the current CT?
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
Close
|
D
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
6 | 7 |
train_848_i_1.nii.gz
|
Past sequences of peribronchial thickening: [0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1]. (Note: 0 indicates absence, and 1 indicates presence.) Classification uses sequences and current image. How has peribronchial thickening progressed according to its temporal sequence?
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
Close
|
B
|
Refractory Lesion (Persistent or recurrent, now present)
|
Resolved Lesion (Previously present or recurrent, now absent)
|
New Lesion (Absent previously, now present)
|
No Abnormality (Always absent)
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.