example_submission.jsonl

{"model_name": "GPT-4-CodeReview", "programming_language": "Python", "comment_language": "en", "topic": "Code Reliability", "observation_id": "obs_001", "code_snippet": "def calculate_sum(a, b):\n    return a + b", "review_text": "This function is simple and correct, but consider adding type hints and docstring for better documentation.", "readability": 8.5, "relevance": 9.0, "explanation_clarity": 7.8, "problem_identification": 8.2, "actionability": 8.7, "completeness": 8.0, "specificity": 7.5, "contextual_adequacy": 8.3, "consistency": 8.8, "brevity": 7.2, "pass_at_1": 0.75, "pass_at_5": 0.88, "pass_at_10": 0.92, "bleu_at_10": 0.65, "total_evaluations": 100}
{"model_name": "GPT-4-CodeReview", "programming_language": "Java", "comment_language": "en", "topic": "Coding Standards", "observation_id": "obs_002", "code_snippet": "public class Calculator {\n    public int add(int a, int b) {\n        return a + b;\n    }\n}", "review_text": "Consider following Java naming conventions and adding JavaDoc comments. The method is functionally correct.", "readability": 8.2, "relevance": 8.8, "explanation_clarity": 7.5, "problem_identification": 8.0, "actionability": 8.5, "completeness": 7.8, "specificity": 7.2, "contextual_adequacy": 8.1, "consistency": 8.6, "brevity": 7.0, "pass_at_1": 0.72, "pass_at_5": 0.85, "pass_at_10": 0.90, "bleu_at_10": 0.62, "total_evaluations": 100}
{"model_name": "Claude-3-CodeReview", "programming_language": "Scala", "comment_language": "ru", "topic": "Performance Issues", "observation_id": "obs_003", "code_snippet": "def fibonacci(n: Int): Int = {\n  if (n <= 1) n\n  else fibonacci(n-1) + fibonacci(n-2)\n}", "review_text": "Эта реализация неэффективна из-за экспоненциальной сложности. Рекомендуется использовать мемоизацию или итеративный подход.", "readability": 8.8, "relevance": 8.5, "explanation_clarity": 8.2, "problem_identification": 9.2, "actionability": 8.3, "completeness": 8.5, "specificity": 8.0, "contextual_adequacy": 8.6, "consistency": 8.2, "brevity": 8.8, "pass_at_1": 0.78, "pass_at_5": 0.89, "pass_at_10": 0.93, "bleu_at_10": 0.68, "total_evaluations": 100}
{"model_name": "Llama-CodeReview", "programming_language": "Go", "comment_language": "en", "topic": "Variables", "observation_id": "obs_004", "code_snippet": "package main\n\nimport \"fmt\"\n\nfunc main() {\n    var x int = 5\n    var y int = 10\n    fmt.Println(x + y)\n}", "review_text": "Consider using short variable declarations (:=) for local variables. Also, the variable names could be more descriptive.", "readability": 7.5, "relevance": 7.8, "explanation_clarity": 7.0, "problem_identification": 7.5, "actionability": 7.2, "completeness": 7.8, "specificity": 6.8, "contextual_adequacy": 7.3, "consistency": 7.6, "brevity": 6.5, "pass_at_1": 0.65, "pass_at_5": 0.78, "pass_at_10": 0.85, "bleu_at_10": 0.55, "total_evaluations": 100}