+
+
+
+
+
+
+In [36]:
+
+
+
+
+
+## Handle secrets either from env vars or streamlit manager
+import streamlit as st
+import os
+api_key = os.getenv("LITELLM_KEY")
+if api_key is None:
+ api_key = st.secrets["LITELLM_KEY"]
+cirrus_key = os.getenv("CIRRUS_KEY")
+if cirrus_key is None:
+ cirrus_key = st.secrets["CIRRUS_KEY"]
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+In [37]:
+
+
+
+
+
+import os
+import requests
+import zipfile
+
+def download_and_unzip(url, output_dir):
+ response = requests.get(url)
+ zip_file_path = os.path.basename(url)
+ with open(zip_file_path, 'wb') as f:
+ f.write(response.content)
+ with zipfile.ZipFile(zip_file_path, 'r') as zip_ref:
+ zip_ref.extractall(output_dir)
+ os.remove(zip_file_path)
+
+download_and_unzip("https://minio.carlboettiger.info/public-data/hwc.zip", "hwc")
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+In [38]:
+
+
+
+
+
+import pathlib
+from langchain_community.document_loaders import PyPDFLoader
+
+def pdf_loader(path):
+ all_documents = []
+ docs_dir = pathlib.Path(path)
+ for file in docs_dir.iterdir():
+ loader = PyPDFLoader(file)
+ documents = loader.load()
+ all_documents.extend(documents)
+ return all_documents
+
+docs = pdf_loader('hwc/')
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+In [39]:
+
+
+
+
+
+# NRP embedding model tends to throw errors
+# embedding = OpenAIEmbeddings(model = "embed-mistral", api_key = api_key, base_url = "https://llm.nrp-nautilus.io")
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+In [40]:
+
+
+
+
+
+## Use the model on Cirrus instead:
+
+from langchain_openai import OpenAIEmbeddings
+embedding = OpenAIEmbeddings(
+ model = "cirrus",
+ api_key = cirrus_key,
+ base_url = "https://llm.cirrus.carlboettiger.info/v1",
+)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+In [41]:
+
+
+
+
+
+# Build a retrival agent
+from langchain_text_splitters import RecursiveCharacterTextSplitter
+text_splitter = RecursiveCharacterTextSplitter(chunk_size=5000, chunk_overlap=500)
+splits = text_splitter.split_documents(docs)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+In [42]:
+
+
+
+
+
+# slow part here, runs on remote GPU
+from langchain_core.vectorstores import InMemoryVectorStore
+vectorstore = InMemoryVectorStore.from_documents(documents = splits, embedding = embedding)
+retriever = vectorstore.as_retriever()
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+In [43]:
+
+
+
+
+
+# Choose any of the models listed by their short-name:
+# see `curl -H "Authorization: Bearer $OPENAI_API_KEY" https://llm.nrp-nautilus.io/v1/models`
+"""
+models = {"llama3": "llama3-sdsc",
+ "deepseek-small": "DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B",
+ "deepseek": "deepseek-r1-qwen-qualcomm",
+ "gemma3": "gemma3",
+ "phi3": "phi3",
+ "olmo": "olmo"
+ }
+"""
+from langchain_openai import ChatOpenAI
+#llm = ChatOpenAI(model = models['gemma3'],
+ #api_key = api_key,
+ #base_url = "https://llm.nrp-nautilus.io",
+ #temperature=0)
+
+
+from langchain.chains import create_retrieval_chain
+from langchain.chains.combine_documents import create_stuff_documents_chain
+from langchain_core.prompts import ChatPromptTemplate
+
+system_prompt = (
+ "You are an assistant for question-answering tasks. "
+ "Use the following scientific articles as the retrieved context to answer "
+ "the question. Appropriately cite the articles from the context on which your answer is based using (Author, Year) format. "
+ "Do not attempt to cite articles that are not in the context."
+ "If you don't know the answer, say that you don't know."
+ "Use up to five sentences maximum and keep the answer concise.\n\n"
+ "{context}"
+)
+"""
+prompt = ChatPromptTemplate.from_messages(
+ [
+ ("system", system_prompt),
+ ("human", "{input}"),
+ ]
+)
+question_answer_chain = create_stuff_documents_chain(retriever, prompt)
+rag_chain = create_retrieval_chain(retriever, question_answer_chain)
+"""
+
+def test_retriever_only(query: str, k: int = 5):
+ retriever.search_kwargs["k"] = k # restrict top-k results
+ retrieved_docs = retriever.invoke(query)
+
+ print(f"\n🔍 Query: {query}")
+ print(f"\n📄 Top {k} Retrieved Documents:\n" + "-"*60)
+
+ for i, doc in enumerate(retrieved_docs):
+ print(f"\n--- Document #{i+1} ---")
+ print(doc.page_content[:1000]) # preview first 1000 chars
+ if hasattr(doc, "metadata") and doc.metadata:
+ print("\n[Metadata]:", doc.metadata)
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+In [44]:
+
+
+
+
+
+test_query = "I live in Tanzania and am having issues with lions breaking into my boma and preying on cattle. What are a few ways to help me prevent this from happening in the future? Can you check these pdfs to see which ones might help? https://minio.carlboettiger.info/public-data/hwc.zip"
+test_retriever_only(test_query, k=5)
+test_retriever_only
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
++🔍 Query: I live in Tanzania and am having issues with lions breaking into my boma and preying on cattle. What are a few ways to help me prevent this from happening in the future? Can you check these pdfs to see which ones might help? https://minio.carlboettiger.info/public-data/hwc.zip + +📄 Top 5 Retrieved Documents: +------------------------------------------------------------ + +--- Document #1 --- +242 Conflict Intervention Priorities +helps foster more effective collaboration (Game et al. +2013; Lute et al. 2018). Third, both the survey results +and feedback were consistent with recent scholarship +(Redpath et al. 2017) that highlights participatory and +stakeholder-first conflict interventions as best practice +and advocates multipronged (Hazzah et al. 2014) and +adaptive management strategies (Bunnefeld et al. 2017). +Education and awareness programs were often cited in +feedback as being necessary additions to any interven- +tions. However, given the failures of many awareness- +based conservation programs (Schultz 2011), a further +exploration into why and where conservation decision +makers deem them most appropriate is important. Ap- +proaches that are specifically aimed at a particular au- +dience, such as social marketing (Salazar et al. 2018), +may be more effective than simple information provision +or—often-problematic—enforcement (Duffy et al. 2019). +However, how different interventio + +[Metadata]: {'producer': 'Acrobat Distiller 10.1.10 (Windows); modified using iText 4.2.0 by 1T3XT', 'creator': 'LaTeX with hyperref package', 'creationdate': '2020-01-16T12:33:42+05:30', 'keywords': '', 'moddate': '2025-05-27T12:12:25-07:00', 'subject': 'Conservation Biology 2020.34:232-243', 'wps-proclevel': '3', 'wps-journaldoi': '10.1111/(ISSN)1523-1739', 'author': '', 'title': 'Predicting intervention priorities for wildlife conflicts', 'wps-articledoi': '10.1111/cobi.13372', 'source': 'hwc\\Baynham-Herd et al. 2019.pdf', 'total_pages': 12, 'page': 10, 'page_label': '242'} + +--- Document #2 --- +8 + + + + + +Figure A5. Silhouette width plot of the k-medoid partitions with k = 2 to 10 used to estimate the best +number of clusters to describe livestock husbandry systems within the wolf range in northern Portugal +(see the main text for details). + +2 4 6 8 10 +0.20 0.22 0.24 0.26 0.28 0.30 0.32 +Number of clusters +Silhouette Width + +[Metadata]: {'producer': 'PDF Architect 3', 'creator': 'PDF Architect 3', 'creationdate': '2017-01-25T14:50:41+00:00', 'author': 'V. Pimenta', 'moddate': '2017-01-25T14:52:31+00:00', 'source': 'hwc\\Pimenta et al. 2017.pdf', 'total_pages': 20, 'page': 17, 'page_label': '18'} + +--- Document #3 --- +Fig 1. The effects of AC programs on three metrics of black bear wariness, Whistler BC, 2007–2008. A and B show +the average observed percent change in overt reaction distance and displace ment distance among bears in the AC +Group and the Control Group. Error bars represent standard error. C shows the predicted effect of the number of AC +events conduc ted during the previous 30 days on the likeliho od that a bear will flee from research ers prior to their +beginning AC treatm ent. +https://d oi.org/10.1371/j ournal.pon e.0295989.g0 01 +PLOS ONE +Aversive condition ing of conflict black bears +PLOS ONE | https://doi.or g/10.137 1/journal.po ne.02959 89 January 2, 2024 8 / 19 + +[Metadata]: {'producer': 'PDFlib+PDI 9.3.1p2 (C++/Win64)', 'creator': 'PTC Arbortext Layout Developer 12.1.6180/W-x64', 'creationdate': '2023-12-25T16:46:13+05:30', 'title': 'Aversive conditioning increases short-term wariness but does not change habitat use in black bears associated with conflict', 'epsprocessor': 'PStill version 1.84.42', 'author': 'Lori Homstol, Sage Raymond, Claire Edwards, Anthony N. Hamilton, Colleen Cassady St. Clair', 'moddate': '2023-12-25T16:46:13+05:30', 'source': 'hwc\\Homstol et al. 2024.pdf', 'total_pages': 19, 'page': 7, 'page_label': '8'} + +--- Document #4 --- +51] and other carnivores, such as coyotes (Canis latrans) [69, 70], African lions (Panthera leo) +[71], and wolves (Canis lupus) [72]. The relative effectiveness of these AC programs for +increasing wariness could relate to several aspects of program implementation. Because we +subjected bears to aversive stimuli as they engaged in problematic behaviour [48, 50], we +increased the likelihood that bears associated the conditioning stimulus (conflict behaviour) +with the unconditioned stimulus (pain/ stress) [38, 52]. This principle of immediacy in aver- +sive conditioning [54] is not achieved when aversive conditioning occurs upon release of a +captured bear, sometimes hours later and kilometres distant from the capture location where +conflict occurred [32]. Repetition of treatments allowed bears to generalize among experiences +instead of associating the painful stimulus with a single location or human individual, which +has been identified as important to AC programs targeting bold coyotes [69 + +[Metadata]: {'producer': 'PDFlib+PDI 9.3.1p2 (C++/Win64)', 'creator': 'PTC Arbortext Layout Developer 12.1.6180/W-x64', 'creationdate': '2023-12-25T16:46:13+05:30', 'title': 'Aversive conditioning increases short-term wariness but does not change habitat use in black bears associated with conflict', 'epsprocessor': 'PStill version 1.84.42', 'author': 'Lori Homstol, Sage Raymond, Claire Edwards, Anthony N. Hamilton, Colleen Cassady St. Clair', 'moddate': '2023-12-25T16:46:13+05:30', 'source': 'hwc\\Homstol et al. 2024.pdf', 'total_pages': 19, 'page': 12, 'page_label': '13'} + +--- Document #5 --- +3 +Vol.:(0123456789)Scientific RepoRtS | (2020) 10:15341 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72343-6 +www.nature.com/scientificreports/ +numbers increase and more bears need more food26,43,44. Hence, the effectiveness of anti-bear interventions can +be lower than expected when hungry bears become persistent and more aggressive in damaging behaviour. As +high density may lead to more bears involved in conflicts, it also could increase the demand for bear removal45 +and affect the effectiveness of removal techniques such as translocation and lethal control. +In this paper, we compiled a global database of intervention effectiveness against bears and studied how it +is related to bear species and densities, duration of intervention application, and intervention techniques. We +attempted to find and describe the most effective and the least effective interventions against bears. Further, we +tested several hypotheses: (1) lethal control and invasive management are less effective th + +[Metadata]: {'producer': 'Adobe PDF Library 15.0; modified using iText® 5.3.5 ©2000-2012 1T3XT BVBA (SPRINGER SBM; licensed version)', 'creator': 'Springer', 'creationdate': '2020-09-14T15:09:33+05:30', 'crossmarkdomains[1]': 'springer.com', 'moddate': '2020-09-14T15:58:07+02:00', 'crossmarkmajorversiondate': '2010-04-23', 'subject': 'Scientific Reports, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72343-6', 'author': 'Igor Khorozyan', 'title': 'Variation and conservation implications of the effectiveness of anti-bear interventions', 'crossmarkdomainexclusive': 'true', 'robots': 'noindex', 'doi': '10.1038/s41598-020-72343-6', 'crossmarkdomains[2]': 'springerlink.com', 'source': 'hwc\\Khorozyan and Waltert 2020.pdf', 'total_pages': 9, 'page': 2, 'page_label': '3'} ++
+
+Out[44]:
+
+
+<function __main__.test_retriever_only(query: str, k: int = 5)>+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+In [60]:
+
+
+
+
+
+test_query = "What should I do if elephants are destroying my crops? And what are the most cost-effective prevention methods, if there are any you know of? Can you check these pdfs to see which ones might help? https://minio.carlboettiger.info/public-data/hwc.zip"
+test_retriever_only(test_query, k=5)
+test_retriever_only
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
++🔍 Query: What should I do if elephants are destroying my crops? And what are the most cost-effective prevention methods, if there are any you know of? Can you check these pdfs to see which ones might help? https://minio.carlboettiger.info/public-data/hwc.zip + +📄 Top 5 Retrieved Documents: +------------------------------------------------------------ + +--- Document #1 --- +242 Conflict Intervention Priorities +helps foster more effective collaboration (Game et al. +2013; Lute et al. 2018). Third, both the survey results +and feedback were consistent with recent scholarship +(Redpath et al. 2017) that highlights participatory and +stakeholder-first conflict interventions as best practice +and advocates multipronged (Hazzah et al. 2014) and +adaptive management strategies (Bunnefeld et al. 2017). +Education and awareness programs were often cited in +feedback as being necessary additions to any interven- +tions. However, given the failures of many awareness- +based conservation programs (Schultz 2011), a further +exploration into why and where conservation decision +makers deem them most appropriate is important. Ap- +proaches that are specifically aimed at a particular au- +dience, such as social marketing (Salazar et al. 2018), +may be more effective than simple information provision +or—often-problematic—enforcement (Duffy et al. 2019). +However, how different interventio + +[Metadata]: {'producer': 'Acrobat Distiller 10.1.10 (Windows); modified using iText 4.2.0 by 1T3XT', 'creator': 'LaTeX with hyperref package', 'creationdate': '2020-01-16T12:33:42+05:30', 'keywords': '', 'moddate': '2025-05-27T12:12:25-07:00', 'subject': 'Conservation Biology 2020.34:232-243', 'wps-proclevel': '3', 'wps-journaldoi': '10.1111/(ISSN)1523-1739', 'author': '', 'title': 'Predicting intervention priorities for wildlife conflicts', 'wps-articledoi': '10.1111/cobi.13372', 'source': 'hwc\\Baynham-Herd et al. 2019.pdf', 'total_pages': 12, 'page': 10, 'page_label': '242'} + +--- Document #2 --- +Fig 1. The effects of AC programs on three metrics of black bear wariness, Whistler BC, 2007–2008. A and B show +the average observed percent change in overt reaction distance and displace ment distance among bears in the AC +Group and the Control Group. Error bars represent standard error. C shows the predicted effect of the number of AC +events conduc ted during the previous 30 days on the likeliho od that a bear will flee from research ers prior to their +beginning AC treatm ent. +https://d oi.org/10.1371/j ournal.pon e.0295989.g0 01 +PLOS ONE +Aversive condition ing of conflict black bears +PLOS ONE | https://doi.or g/10.137 1/journal.po ne.02959 89 January 2, 2024 8 / 19 + +[Metadata]: {'producer': 'PDFlib+PDI 9.3.1p2 (C++/Win64)', 'creator': 'PTC Arbortext Layout Developer 12.1.6180/W-x64', 'creationdate': '2023-12-25T16:46:13+05:30', 'title': 'Aversive conditioning increases short-term wariness but does not change habitat use in black bears associated with conflict', 'epsprocessor': 'PStill version 1.84.42', 'author': 'Lori Homstol, Sage Raymond, Claire Edwards, Anthony N. Hamilton, Colleen Cassady St. Clair', 'moddate': '2023-12-25T16:46:13+05:30', 'source': 'hwc\\Homstol et al. 2024.pdf', 'total_pages': 19, 'page': 7, 'page_label': '8'} + +--- Document #3 --- +51] and other carnivores, such as coyotes (Canis latrans) [69, 70], African lions (Panthera leo) +[71], and wolves (Canis lupus) [72]. The relative effectiveness of these AC programs for +increasing wariness could relate to several aspects of program implementation. Because we +subjected bears to aversive stimuli as they engaged in problematic behaviour [48, 50], we +increased the likelihood that bears associated the conditioning stimulus (conflict behaviour) +with the unconditioned stimulus (pain/ stress) [38, 52]. This principle of immediacy in aver- +sive conditioning [54] is not achieved when aversive conditioning occurs upon release of a +captured bear, sometimes hours later and kilometres distant from the capture location where +conflict occurred [32]. Repetition of treatments allowed bears to generalize among experiences +instead of associating the painful stimulus with a single location or human individual, which +has been identified as important to AC programs targeting bold coyotes [69 + +[Metadata]: {'producer': 'PDFlib+PDI 9.3.1p2 (C++/Win64)', 'creator': 'PTC Arbortext Layout Developer 12.1.6180/W-x64', 'creationdate': '2023-12-25T16:46:13+05:30', 'title': 'Aversive conditioning increases short-term wariness but does not change habitat use in black bears associated with conflict', 'epsprocessor': 'PStill version 1.84.42', 'author': 'Lori Homstol, Sage Raymond, Claire Edwards, Anthony N. Hamilton, Colleen Cassady St. Clair', 'moddate': '2023-12-25T16:46:13+05:30', 'source': 'hwc\\Homstol et al. 2024.pdf', 'total_pages': 19, 'page': 12, 'page_label': '13'} + +--- Document #4 --- +* Correspondence: B. F. Blackwell, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Animal and +Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research +Center, Ohio Field Station, Sandusky, OH, 44870, U.S.A. +E-mail address: bradley.f.blackwell@aphis.usda.gov (B. F. Blackwell). +Contents lists available atScienceDirect +Animal Behaviour +journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/anbehav +http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.07.013 +0003-3472/Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. +Animal Behaviour 120 (2016) 245e254 +SPECIAL ISSUE: CONSERVATION BEHAVIOUR + +[Metadata]: {'producer': 'Acrobat Distiller 8.1.0 (Windows)', 'creator': 'Elsevier', 'creationdate': '2016-09-26T20:02:29+05:30', 'crossmarkdomains[2]': 'elsevier.com', 'crossmarkmajorversiondate': '2010-04-23', 'subject': 'Animal Behaviour, 120 (2016) 245-254. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.07.013', 'author': 'Bradley F. Blackwell', 'elsevierwebpdfspecifications': '6.5', 'crossmarkdomainexclusive': 'true', 'robots': 'noindex', 'moddate': '2016-09-26T20:03:01+05:30', 'doi': '10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.07.013', 'crossmarkdomains[1]': 'sciencedirect.com', 'title': 'No single solution: application of behavioural principles in mitigating human-wildlife conflict', 'source': 'hwc\\Blackwell et al. 2016.pdf', 'total_pages': 10, 'page': 0, 'page_label': '245'} + +--- Document #5 --- +3 +Vol.:(0123456789)Scientific RepoRtS | (2020) 10:15341 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72343-6 +www.nature.com/scientificreports/ +numbers increase and more bears need more food26,43,44. Hence, the effectiveness of anti-bear interventions can +be lower than expected when hungry bears become persistent and more aggressive in damaging behaviour. As +high density may lead to more bears involved in conflicts, it also could increase the demand for bear removal45 +and affect the effectiveness of removal techniques such as translocation and lethal control. +In this paper, we compiled a global database of intervention effectiveness against bears and studied how it +is related to bear species and densities, duration of intervention application, and intervention techniques. We +attempted to find and describe the most effective and the least effective interventions against bears. Further, we +tested several hypotheses: (1) lethal control and invasive management are less effective th + +[Metadata]: {'producer': 'Adobe PDF Library 15.0; modified using iText® 5.3.5 ©2000-2012 1T3XT BVBA (SPRINGER SBM; licensed version)', 'creator': 'Springer', 'creationdate': '2020-09-14T15:09:33+05:30', 'crossmarkdomains[1]': 'springer.com', 'moddate': '2020-09-14T15:58:07+02:00', 'crossmarkmajorversiondate': '2010-04-23', 'subject': 'Scientific Reports, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72343-6', 'author': 'Igor Khorozyan', 'title': 'Variation and conservation implications of the effectiveness of anti-bear interventions', 'crossmarkdomainexclusive': 'true', 'robots': 'noindex', 'doi': '10.1038/s41598-020-72343-6', 'crossmarkdomains[2]': 'springerlink.com', 'source': 'hwc\\Khorozyan and Waltert 2020.pdf', 'total_pages': 9, 'page': 2, 'page_label': '3'} ++
+
+Out[60]:
+
+
+<function __main__.test_retriever_only(query: str, k: int = 5)>+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+In [48]:
+
+
+
+
+
+test_query = "I know jaguars can prey on goats and cattle, which I have; what measures can I take to save them from getting harmed? Can you check these pdfs to see which ones might help? https://minio.carlboettiger.info/public-data/hwc.zip."
+test_retriever_only(test_query, k=5)
+test_retriever_only
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
++🔍 Query: I know jaguars can prey on goats and cattle, which I have; what measures can I take to save them from getting harmed? Can you check these pdfs to see which ones might help? https://minio.carlboettiger.info/public-data/hwc.zip. + +📄 Top 5 Retrieved Documents: +------------------------------------------------------------ + +--- Document #1 --- +Graduate Fellowship from the University of Alberta +(https://w ww.ualberta.c a/index.htm l), and an +Alberta Gradua te Excellenc e Fellowship from the +Province of Alberta (https://stude ntaid.alber ta.ca/ +scholarships /alberta-gradua te-excellenc e- +scholarship/ ). Additional financial support was +provided by an NSERC Discovery Grant (RGPIN- +2017-05915) and a Univers ity of Alberta Faculty of +Science Research Fellowsh ip awarded to C.C.S.C. +The British Columbia Conservatio n Officer Service +provided funding and assisted with field methods +but did not contribute to data analysis , the decision +to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. +Funding was also provided by the following +organizations : British Columbia Conservati on +Foundation (https://bccf .com/), Carney’s +WasteMana gement (https://dum psterrentals depot. +ca/dumpst er-rentals-whi stler/compan y/carneys- +waste-sys tems/), The Get Bear Smart Society +(https://w ww.bearsmar t.com/), Mountain +Equipment Co-op (https://www .mec.ca/en + +[Metadata]: {'producer': 'PDFlib+PDI 9.3.1p2 (C++/Win64)', 'creator': 'PTC Arbortext Layout Developer 12.1.6180/W-x64', 'creationdate': '2023-12-25T16:46:13+05:30', 'title': 'Aversive conditioning increases short-term wariness but does not change habitat use in black bears associated with conflict', 'epsprocessor': 'PStill version 1.84.42', 'author': 'Lori Homstol, Sage Raymond, Claire Edwards, Anthony N. Hamilton, Colleen Cassady St. Clair', 'moddate': '2023-12-25T16:46:13+05:30', 'source': 'hwc\\Homstol et al. 2024.pdf', 'total_pages': 19, 'page': 1, 'page_label': '2'} + +--- Document #2 --- +Received: 8 June 2023 | Revised: 30 October 2023 | Accepted: 31 October 2023 +DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.22526 +REVIEW +Methods to mitigate human–wildlife conflicts +involving common mesopredators: a +meta‐analysis +Louis Lazure1,2 | Robert B. Weladji1 +1Concordia University, 7141 Sherbrooke +Street West, Montréal, QC H4B 1R6, Canada +2Zoo de Granby, 525 Saint‐Hubert Street, +Granby, QC J2G 5P3, Canada +Correspondence +Louis Lazure, Zoo de Granby, 525 Saint‐ +Hubert Street, Granby, QC J2G 5P3, Canada. +Email: llazure@zoodegranby.com +Abstract +Conflicts between humans and mesopredators are frequent +and widespread. Over the last decades, conflicts have led to +the development and application of different mitigation +methods to diminish the costs and damage caused by such +conflicts. We conducted a systematic literature search and +meta‐analysis to assess the influence of different mitigation +methods on 3 common nuisance species: raccoons (Procyon +lotor), red foxes (Vulpes vulpes), and striped skunks (Mephitis +mephi + +[Metadata]: {'producer': 'iText 4.2.0 by 1T3XT', 'creator': 'John Wiley & Sons', 'creationdate': '2024-01-03T16:15:52+05:30', 'keywords': 'management; Mephitis mephitis; mitigation; Procyon lotor; raccoon; red fox; striped skunk; Vulpes vulpes', 'moddate': '2025-05-27T12:12:05-07:00', 'subject': 'J Wildl Manag 2024.88:e22526', 'wps-proclevel': '3', 'wps-journaldoi': '10.1002/(ISSN)1937-2817', 'author': '', 'title': 'Methods to mitigate human–wildlife conflicts involving common mesopredators: a meta‐analysis', 'wps-articledoi': '10.1002/jwmg.22526', 'source': 'hwc\\Lazure and Weladji 2023.pdf', 'total_pages': 21, 'page': 0, 'page_label': '1'} + +--- Document #3 --- +7,3 1 7e325 +. +Hovick, T. J., Elmore, R. D., Dahlgren, D. K., Fuhlendorf, S. D., & Engle, D. M. (2014). +Evidence of negative effects of anthropogenic structures on wildlife: A review of +grouse survival and behaviour.Journal of Applied Ecology, 51, 1680e1689. +Huijser, M., McGowen, P., Fuller, J., Hardy, A., Kociolek, A., Clevenger, A. P., et al. +(2008). Wildlifeevehicle collision reduction study: Report to congress [No. +FHWAeHRTe08e034]. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Transportation. +Hunt, W. G., McClure, C. J. W., & Allison, T. D. (2015). Do raptors react to ultraviolet +light? Journal of Raptor Research, 49, 342e343. +Jaeger, M. M., Blejwas, K. M., Sacks, B. N., Neale, J. C. C., Conner, M. M., & +McCullough, D. R. (2001). Targeting alphas can make coyote control more +effective and socially acceptable.California Agriculture, 55,3 2e36. +Johnson, H. E., Breck, S. W., Baruch-Mordo, S., Lewis, D. L., Lackey, C. W., +Wilson, K. R., et al. (2015). Shifting perceptions of risk and reward: Te + +[Metadata]: {'producer': 'Acrobat Distiller 8.1.0 (Windows)', 'creator': 'Elsevier', 'creationdate': '2016-09-26T20:02:29+05:30', 'crossmarkdomains[2]': 'elsevier.com', 'crossmarkmajorversiondate': '2010-04-23', 'subject': 'Animal Behaviour, 120 (2016) 245-254. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.07.013', 'author': 'Bradley F. Blackwell', 'elsevierwebpdfspecifications': '6.5', 'crossmarkdomainexclusive': 'true', 'robots': 'noindex', 'moddate': '2016-09-26T20:03:01+05:30', 'doi': '10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.07.013', 'crossmarkdomains[1]': 'sciencedirect.com', 'title': 'No single solution: application of behavioural principles in mitigating human-wildlife conflict', 'source': 'hwc\\Blackwell et al. 2016.pdf', 'total_pages': 10, 'page': 8, 'page_label': '253'} + +--- Document #4 --- +Measuring and mapping the influence of landscape factors on +livestock predation by wolves in Mongolia +Hannah S. Daviea,*,1, James D. Murdocha, Ankhbayar Lhagvasurenb, Richard P. Readingc +a University of Vermont, Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources, Wildlife and Fisheries Biology Program, George D. Aiken Center, 81 +Carrigan Drive, Burlington, VT 05405, USA +b National University of Mongolia, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia +c Denver Zoological Foundation, Department of Conservation Biology, 2300 Steele Street, Denver, CO 80205, USA +article info +Article history: +Received 13 October 2013 +Received in revised form +22 January 2014 +Accepted 22 January 2014 +Available online 13 February 2014 +Keywords: +Canis lupus +Human-carnivore conflict +Mahalanobis D +2 (k) +Predation risk +Steppe +abstract +Gray wolves (Canis lupus) are a top predator in northern Asian ecosystems and often perceived as a threat +to livestock. As a result, wolves are heavily persecuted and populations have declined throughout m + +[Metadata]: {'producer': 'Acrobat Distiller 8.1.0 (Windows)', 'creator': 'Elsevier', 'creationdate': '2014-03-19T00:35:16+05:30', 'crossmarkdomains[2]': 'elsevier.com', 'crossmarkmajorversiondate': '2010-04-23', 'subject': 'Journal of Arid Environments, 103 (2014) 85-91. doi:10.1016/j.jaridenv.2014.01.008', 'author': 'Hannah S. Davie', 'elsevierwebpdfspecifications': '6.4', 'crossmarkdomainexclusive': 'true', 'robots': 'noindex', 'moddate': '2014-03-19T20:46:23+05:30', 'doi': '10.1016/j.jaridenv.2014.01.008', 'crossmarkdomains[1]': 'sciencedirect.com', 'title': 'Measuring and mapping the influence of landscape factors on livestock predation by wolves in Mongolia', 'source': 'hwc\\Davie et al. 2014.pdf', 'total_pages': 7, 'page': 0, 'page_label': '85'} + +--- Document #5 --- +Mongabay.com Open Access Journal - Tropical Conservation Science Vol. 9 (2): 921-930, 2016 + +Tropical Conservation Science | ISSN 1940-0829 | Tropicalconservationscience.org +925 +Community-based organizations to support chili fences +Communities living in wildlife dispersal areas and protected area buffer zones, which tend to comprise +land of low agricultural productivity, typically have little income to buy the materials needed to construct +chili fences, especially at the height of the raiding season when the crops are still in the fields and not in +the markets. Thus, the project encouraged farmers to establish Community-Based Organizations (CBOs) +and integrated micro-credit finance schemes [27, 29] as a way to support the use of chili fences. These +CBOs enabled villagers to draw on their savings at critical times to purchase essential materials to protect +their crops. + +The Village Savings and Loans (VSL) micro-credit system allows members of a self-selected group to +volun + +[Metadata]: {'producer': 'þÿMicrosoft® Word 2016; modified using iText 4.2.0 by 1T3XT', 'creator': 'Microsoft® Word 2016', 'creationdate': '2016-05-30T17:02:47-05:00', 'moddate': '2025-05-27T12:02:07-07:00', 'subject': 'Tropical Conservation Science 2016.9:921-930', 'author': 'Alejandro Estrada', 'title': 'Scaling-Up the Use of Chili Fences for Reducing Human-Elephant Conflict Across Landscapes in Tanzania', 'source': 'hwc\\Chang_a et al. 2016.pdf', 'total_pages': 10, 'page': 4, 'page_label': '5'} ++
+
+Out[48]:
+
+
+<function __main__.test_retriever_only(query: str, k: int = 5)>+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+In [50]:
+
+
+
+
+
+test_query = "I am trying to prevent coyotes from eating the calves of my free-range cattle. What may work best and incentivize them to stay away? Can you check these pdfs to see which ones might help? https://minio.carlboettiger.info/public-data/hwc.zip"
+test_retriever_only(test_query, k=5)
+test_retriever_only
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
++🔍 Query: I am trying to prevent coyotes from eating the calves of my free-range cattle. What may work best and incentivize them to stay away? Can you check these pdfs to see which ones might help? https://minio.carlboettiger.info/public-data/hwc.zip + +📄 Top 5 Retrieved Documents: +------------------------------------------------------------ + +--- Document #1 --- +242 Conflict Intervention Priorities +helps foster more effective collaboration (Game et al. +2013; Lute et al. 2018). Third, both the survey results +and feedback were consistent with recent scholarship +(Redpath et al. 2017) that highlights participatory and +stakeholder-first conflict interventions as best practice +and advocates multipronged (Hazzah et al. 2014) and +adaptive management strategies (Bunnefeld et al. 2017). +Education and awareness programs were often cited in +feedback as being necessary additions to any interven- +tions. However, given the failures of many awareness- +based conservation programs (Schultz 2011), a further +exploration into why and where conservation decision +makers deem them most appropriate is important. Ap- +proaches that are specifically aimed at a particular au- +dience, such as social marketing (Salazar et al. 2018), +may be more effective than simple information provision +or—often-problematic—enforcement (Duffy et al. 2019). +However, how different interventio + +[Metadata]: {'producer': 'Acrobat Distiller 10.1.10 (Windows); modified using iText 4.2.0 by 1T3XT', 'creator': 'LaTeX with hyperref package', 'creationdate': '2020-01-16T12:33:42+05:30', 'keywords': '', 'moddate': '2025-05-27T12:12:25-07:00', 'subject': 'Conservation Biology 2020.34:232-243', 'wps-proclevel': '3', 'wps-journaldoi': '10.1111/(ISSN)1523-1739', 'author': '', 'title': 'Predicting intervention priorities for wildlife conflicts', 'wps-articledoi': '10.1111/cobi.13372', 'source': 'hwc\\Baynham-Herd et al. 2019.pdf', 'total_pages': 12, 'page': 10, 'page_label': '242'} + +--- Document #2 --- +Fig 1. The effects of AC programs on three metrics of black bear wariness, Whistler BC, 2007–2008. A and B show +the average observed percent change in overt reaction distance and displace ment distance among bears in the AC +Group and the Control Group. Error bars represent standard error. C shows the predicted effect of the number of AC +events conduc ted during the previous 30 days on the likeliho od that a bear will flee from research ers prior to their +beginning AC treatm ent. +https://d oi.org/10.1371/j ournal.pon e.0295989.g0 01 +PLOS ONE +Aversive condition ing of conflict black bears +PLOS ONE | https://doi.or g/10.137 1/journal.po ne.02959 89 January 2, 2024 8 / 19 + +[Metadata]: {'producer': 'PDFlib+PDI 9.3.1p2 (C++/Win64)', 'creator': 'PTC Arbortext Layout Developer 12.1.6180/W-x64', 'creationdate': '2023-12-25T16:46:13+05:30', 'title': 'Aversive conditioning increases short-term wariness but does not change habitat use in black bears associated with conflict', 'epsprocessor': 'PStill version 1.84.42', 'author': 'Lori Homstol, Sage Raymond, Claire Edwards, Anthony N. Hamilton, Colleen Cassady St. Clair', 'moddate': '2023-12-25T16:46:13+05:30', 'source': 'hwc\\Homstol et al. 2024.pdf', 'total_pages': 19, 'page': 7, 'page_label': '8'} + +--- Document #3 --- +51] and other carnivores, such as coyotes (Canis latrans) [69, 70], African lions (Panthera leo) +[71], and wolves (Canis lupus) [72]. The relative effectiveness of these AC programs for +increasing wariness could relate to several aspects of program implementation. Because we +subjected bears to aversive stimuli as they engaged in problematic behaviour [48, 50], we +increased the likelihood that bears associated the conditioning stimulus (conflict behaviour) +with the unconditioned stimulus (pain/ stress) [38, 52]. This principle of immediacy in aver- +sive conditioning [54] is not achieved when aversive conditioning occurs upon release of a +captured bear, sometimes hours later and kilometres distant from the capture location where +conflict occurred [32]. Repetition of treatments allowed bears to generalize among experiences +instead of associating the painful stimulus with a single location or human individual, which +has been identified as important to AC programs targeting bold coyotes [69 + +[Metadata]: {'producer': 'PDFlib+PDI 9.3.1p2 (C++/Win64)', 'creator': 'PTC Arbortext Layout Developer 12.1.6180/W-x64', 'creationdate': '2023-12-25T16:46:13+05:30', 'title': 'Aversive conditioning increases short-term wariness but does not change habitat use in black bears associated with conflict', 'epsprocessor': 'PStill version 1.84.42', 'author': 'Lori Homstol, Sage Raymond, Claire Edwards, Anthony N. Hamilton, Colleen Cassady St. Clair', 'moddate': '2023-12-25T16:46:13+05:30', 'source': 'hwc\\Homstol et al. 2024.pdf', 'total_pages': 19, 'page': 12, 'page_label': '13'} + +--- Document #4 --- +8 + + + + + +Figure A5. Silhouette width plot of the k-medoid partitions with k = 2 to 10 used to estimate the best +number of clusters to describe livestock husbandry systems within the wolf range in northern Portugal +(see the main text for details). + +2 4 6 8 10 +0.20 0.22 0.24 0.26 0.28 0.30 0.32 +Number of clusters +Silhouette Width + +[Metadata]: {'producer': 'PDF Architect 3', 'creator': 'PDF Architect 3', 'creationdate': '2017-01-25T14:50:41+00:00', 'author': 'V. Pimenta', 'moddate': '2017-01-25T14:52:31+00:00', 'source': 'hwc\\Pimenta et al. 2017.pdf', 'total_pages': 20, 'page': 17, 'page_label': '18'} + +--- Document #5 --- +3 +Vol.:(0123456789)Scientific RepoRtS | (2020) 10:15341 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72343-6 +www.nature.com/scientificreports/ +numbers increase and more bears need more food26,43,44. Hence, the effectiveness of anti-bear interventions can +be lower than expected when hungry bears become persistent and more aggressive in damaging behaviour. As +high density may lead to more bears involved in conflicts, it also could increase the demand for bear removal45 +and affect the effectiveness of removal techniques such as translocation and lethal control. +In this paper, we compiled a global database of intervention effectiveness against bears and studied how it +is related to bear species and densities, duration of intervention application, and intervention techniques. We +attempted to find and describe the most effective and the least effective interventions against bears. Further, we +tested several hypotheses: (1) lethal control and invasive management are less effective th + +[Metadata]: {'producer': 'Adobe PDF Library 15.0; modified using iText® 5.3.5 ©2000-2012 1T3XT BVBA (SPRINGER SBM; licensed version)', 'creator': 'Springer', 'creationdate': '2020-09-14T15:09:33+05:30', 'crossmarkdomains[1]': 'springer.com', 'moddate': '2020-09-14T15:58:07+02:00', 'crossmarkmajorversiondate': '2010-04-23', 'subject': 'Scientific Reports, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72343-6', 'author': 'Igor Khorozyan', 'title': 'Variation and conservation implications of the effectiveness of anti-bear interventions', 'crossmarkdomainexclusive': 'true', 'robots': 'noindex', 'doi': '10.1038/s41598-020-72343-6', 'crossmarkdomains[2]': 'springerlink.com', 'source': 'hwc\\Khorozyan and Waltert 2020.pdf', 'total_pages': 9, 'page': 2, 'page_label': '3'} ++
+
+Out[50]:
+
+
+<function __main__.test_retriever_only(query: str, k: int = 5)>+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+In [52]:
+
+
+
+
+
+test_query = "Deers keep destroying and takiing over our large agricultural fields. Is there anything I can try to prevent this that won’t break the bank? Can you check these pdfs to see which ones might help? https://minio.carlboettiger.info/public-data/hwc.zip"
+test_retriever_only(test_query, k=5)
+test_retriever_only
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
++🔍 Query: Deers keep destroying and takiing over our large agricultural fields. Is there anything I can try to prevent this that won’t break the bank? Can you check these pdfs to see which ones might help? https://minio.carlboettiger.info/public-data/hwc.zip + +📄 Top 5 Retrieved Documents: +------------------------------------------------------------ + +--- Document #1 --- +242 Conflict Intervention Priorities +helps foster more effective collaboration (Game et al. +2013; Lute et al. 2018). Third, both the survey results +and feedback were consistent with recent scholarship +(Redpath et al. 2017) that highlights participatory and +stakeholder-first conflict interventions as best practice +and advocates multipronged (Hazzah et al. 2014) and +adaptive management strategies (Bunnefeld et al. 2017). +Education and awareness programs were often cited in +feedback as being necessary additions to any interven- +tions. However, given the failures of many awareness- +based conservation programs (Schultz 2011), a further +exploration into why and where conservation decision +makers deem them most appropriate is important. Ap- +proaches that are specifically aimed at a particular au- +dience, such as social marketing (Salazar et al. 2018), +may be more effective than simple information provision +or—often-problematic—enforcement (Duffy et al. 2019). +However, how different interventio + +[Metadata]: {'producer': 'Acrobat Distiller 10.1.10 (Windows); modified using iText 4.2.0 by 1T3XT', 'creator': 'LaTeX with hyperref package', 'creationdate': '2020-01-16T12:33:42+05:30', 'keywords': '', 'moddate': '2025-05-27T12:12:25-07:00', 'subject': 'Conservation Biology 2020.34:232-243', 'wps-proclevel': '3', 'wps-journaldoi': '10.1111/(ISSN)1523-1739', 'author': '', 'title': 'Predicting intervention priorities for wildlife conflicts', 'wps-articledoi': '10.1111/cobi.13372', 'source': 'hwc\\Baynham-Herd et al. 2019.pdf', 'total_pages': 12, 'page': 10, 'page_label': '242'} + +--- Document #2 --- +8 + + + + + +Figure A5. Silhouette width plot of the k-medoid partitions with k = 2 to 10 used to estimate the best +number of clusters to describe livestock husbandry systems within the wolf range in northern Portugal +(see the main text for details). + +2 4 6 8 10 +0.20 0.22 0.24 0.26 0.28 0.30 0.32 +Number of clusters +Silhouette Width + +[Metadata]: {'producer': 'PDF Architect 3', 'creator': 'PDF Architect 3', 'creationdate': '2017-01-25T14:50:41+00:00', 'author': 'V. Pimenta', 'moddate': '2017-01-25T14:52:31+00:00', 'source': 'hwc\\Pimenta et al. 2017.pdf', 'total_pages': 20, 'page': 17, 'page_label': '18'} + +--- Document #3 --- +Fig 1. The effects of AC programs on three metrics of black bear wariness, Whistler BC, 2007–2008. A and B show +the average observed percent change in overt reaction distance and displace ment distance among bears in the AC +Group and the Control Group. Error bars represent standard error. C shows the predicted effect of the number of AC +events conduc ted during the previous 30 days on the likeliho od that a bear will flee from research ers prior to their +beginning AC treatm ent. +https://d oi.org/10.1371/j ournal.pon e.0295989.g0 01 +PLOS ONE +Aversive condition ing of conflict black bears +PLOS ONE | https://doi.or g/10.137 1/journal.po ne.02959 89 January 2, 2024 8 / 19 + +[Metadata]: {'producer': 'PDFlib+PDI 9.3.1p2 (C++/Win64)', 'creator': 'PTC Arbortext Layout Developer 12.1.6180/W-x64', 'creationdate': '2023-12-25T16:46:13+05:30', 'title': 'Aversive conditioning increases short-term wariness but does not change habitat use in black bears associated with conflict', 'epsprocessor': 'PStill version 1.84.42', 'author': 'Lori Homstol, Sage Raymond, Claire Edwards, Anthony N. Hamilton, Colleen Cassady St. Clair', 'moddate': '2023-12-25T16:46:13+05:30', 'source': 'hwc\\Homstol et al. 2024.pdf', 'total_pages': 19, 'page': 7, 'page_label': '8'} + +--- Document #4 --- +3 +Vol.:(0123456789)Scientific RepoRtS | (2020) 10:15341 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72343-6 +www.nature.com/scientificreports/ +numbers increase and more bears need more food26,43,44. Hence, the effectiveness of anti-bear interventions can +be lower than expected when hungry bears become persistent and more aggressive in damaging behaviour. As +high density may lead to more bears involved in conflicts, it also could increase the demand for bear removal45 +and affect the effectiveness of removal techniques such as translocation and lethal control. +In this paper, we compiled a global database of intervention effectiveness against bears and studied how it +is related to bear species and densities, duration of intervention application, and intervention techniques. We +attempted to find and describe the most effective and the least effective interventions against bears. Further, we +tested several hypotheses: (1) lethal control and invasive management are less effective th + +[Metadata]: {'producer': 'Adobe PDF Library 15.0; modified using iText® 5.3.5 ©2000-2012 1T3XT BVBA (SPRINGER SBM; licensed version)', 'creator': 'Springer', 'creationdate': '2020-09-14T15:09:33+05:30', 'crossmarkdomains[1]': 'springer.com', 'moddate': '2020-09-14T15:58:07+02:00', 'crossmarkmajorversiondate': '2010-04-23', 'subject': 'Scientific Reports, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72343-6', 'author': 'Igor Khorozyan', 'title': 'Variation and conservation implications of the effectiveness of anti-bear interventions', 'crossmarkdomainexclusive': 'true', 'robots': 'noindex', 'doi': '10.1038/s41598-020-72343-6', 'crossmarkdomains[2]': 'springerlink.com', 'source': 'hwc\\Khorozyan and Waltert 2020.pdf', 'total_pages': 9, 'page': 2, 'page_label': '3'} + +--- Document #5 --- +51] and other carnivores, such as coyotes (Canis latrans) [69, 70], African lions (Panthera leo) +[71], and wolves (Canis lupus) [72]. The relative effectiveness of these AC programs for +increasing wariness could relate to several aspects of program implementation. Because we +subjected bears to aversive stimuli as they engaged in problematic behaviour [48, 50], we +increased the likelihood that bears associated the conditioning stimulus (conflict behaviour) +with the unconditioned stimulus (pain/ stress) [38, 52]. This principle of immediacy in aver- +sive conditioning [54] is not achieved when aversive conditioning occurs upon release of a +captured bear, sometimes hours later and kilometres distant from the capture location where +conflict occurred [32]. Repetition of treatments allowed bears to generalize among experiences +instead of associating the painful stimulus with a single location or human individual, which +has been identified as important to AC programs targeting bold coyotes [69 + +[Metadata]: {'producer': 'PDFlib+PDI 9.3.1p2 (C++/Win64)', 'creator': 'PTC Arbortext Layout Developer 12.1.6180/W-x64', 'creationdate': '2023-12-25T16:46:13+05:30', 'title': 'Aversive conditioning increases short-term wariness but does not change habitat use in black bears associated with conflict', 'epsprocessor': 'PStill version 1.84.42', 'author': 'Lori Homstol, Sage Raymond, Claire Edwards, Anthony N. Hamilton, Colleen Cassady St. Clair', 'moddate': '2023-12-25T16:46:13+05:30', 'source': 'hwc\\Homstol et al. 2024.pdf', 'total_pages': 19, 'page': 12, 'page_label': '13'} ++
+
+Out[52]:
+
+
+<function __main__.test_retriever_only(query: str, k: int = 5)>+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+In [54]:
+
+
+
+
+
+test_query = "We live in a suburb and bears sometimes come into our town to eat from our fruit trees and trash. What are the best ways for us to prevent this as a community without removing our fruit trees? Can you check these pdfs to see which ones might help? https://minio.carlboettiger.info/public-data/hwc.zip"
+test_retriever_only(test_query, k=5)
+test_retriever_only
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
++🔍 Query: We live in a suburb and bears sometimes come into our town to eat from our fruit trees and trash. What are the best ways for us to prevent this as a community without removing our fruit trees? Can you check these pdfs to see which ones might help? https://minio.carlboettiger.info/public-data/hwc.zip + +📄 Top 5 Retrieved Documents: +------------------------------------------------------------ + +--- Document #1 --- +242 Conflict Intervention Priorities +helps foster more effective collaboration (Game et al. +2013; Lute et al. 2018). Third, both the survey results +and feedback were consistent with recent scholarship +(Redpath et al. 2017) that highlights participatory and +stakeholder-first conflict interventions as best practice +and advocates multipronged (Hazzah et al. 2014) and +adaptive management strategies (Bunnefeld et al. 2017). +Education and awareness programs were often cited in +feedback as being necessary additions to any interven- +tions. However, given the failures of many awareness- +based conservation programs (Schultz 2011), a further +exploration into why and where conservation decision +makers deem them most appropriate is important. Ap- +proaches that are specifically aimed at a particular au- +dience, such as social marketing (Salazar et al. 2018), +may be more effective than simple information provision +or—often-problematic—enforcement (Duffy et al. 2019). +However, how different interventio + +[Metadata]: {'producer': 'Acrobat Distiller 10.1.10 (Windows); modified using iText 4.2.0 by 1T3XT', 'creator': 'LaTeX with hyperref package', 'creationdate': '2020-01-16T12:33:42+05:30', 'keywords': '', 'moddate': '2025-05-27T12:12:25-07:00', 'subject': 'Conservation Biology 2020.34:232-243', 'wps-proclevel': '3', 'wps-journaldoi': '10.1111/(ISSN)1523-1739', 'author': '', 'title': 'Predicting intervention priorities for wildlife conflicts', 'wps-articledoi': '10.1111/cobi.13372', 'source': 'hwc\\Baynham-Herd et al. 2019.pdf', 'total_pages': 12, 'page': 10, 'page_label': '242'} + +--- Document #2 --- +8 + + + + + +Figure A5. Silhouette width plot of the k-medoid partitions with k = 2 to 10 used to estimate the best +number of clusters to describe livestock husbandry systems within the wolf range in northern Portugal +(see the main text for details). + +2 4 6 8 10 +0.20 0.22 0.24 0.26 0.28 0.30 0.32 +Number of clusters +Silhouette Width + +[Metadata]: {'producer': 'PDF Architect 3', 'creator': 'PDF Architect 3', 'creationdate': '2017-01-25T14:50:41+00:00', 'author': 'V. Pimenta', 'moddate': '2017-01-25T14:52:31+00:00', 'source': 'hwc\\Pimenta et al. 2017.pdf', 'total_pages': 20, 'page': 17, 'page_label': '18'} + +--- Document #3 --- +51] and other carnivores, such as coyotes (Canis latrans) [69, 70], African lions (Panthera leo) +[71], and wolves (Canis lupus) [72]. The relative effectiveness of these AC programs for +increasing wariness could relate to several aspects of program implementation. Because we +subjected bears to aversive stimuli as they engaged in problematic behaviour [48, 50], we +increased the likelihood that bears associated the conditioning stimulus (conflict behaviour) +with the unconditioned stimulus (pain/ stress) [38, 52]. This principle of immediacy in aver- +sive conditioning [54] is not achieved when aversive conditioning occurs upon release of a +captured bear, sometimes hours later and kilometres distant from the capture location where +conflict occurred [32]. Repetition of treatments allowed bears to generalize among experiences +instead of associating the painful stimulus with a single location or human individual, which +has been identified as important to AC programs targeting bold coyotes [69 + +[Metadata]: {'producer': 'PDFlib+PDI 9.3.1p2 (C++/Win64)', 'creator': 'PTC Arbortext Layout Developer 12.1.6180/W-x64', 'creationdate': '2023-12-25T16:46:13+05:30', 'title': 'Aversive conditioning increases short-term wariness but does not change habitat use in black bears associated with conflict', 'epsprocessor': 'PStill version 1.84.42', 'author': 'Lori Homstol, Sage Raymond, Claire Edwards, Anthony N. Hamilton, Colleen Cassady St. Clair', 'moddate': '2023-12-25T16:46:13+05:30', 'source': 'hwc\\Homstol et al. 2024.pdf', 'total_pages': 19, 'page': 12, 'page_label': '13'} + +--- Document #4 --- +Fig 1. The effects of AC programs on three metrics of black bear wariness, Whistler BC, 2007–2008. A and B show +the average observed percent change in overt reaction distance and displace ment distance among bears in the AC +Group and the Control Group. Error bars represent standard error. C shows the predicted effect of the number of AC +events conduc ted during the previous 30 days on the likeliho od that a bear will flee from research ers prior to their +beginning AC treatm ent. +https://d oi.org/10.1371/j ournal.pon e.0295989.g0 01 +PLOS ONE +Aversive condition ing of conflict black bears +PLOS ONE | https://doi.or g/10.137 1/journal.po ne.02959 89 January 2, 2024 8 / 19 + +[Metadata]: {'producer': 'PDFlib+PDI 9.3.1p2 (C++/Win64)', 'creator': 'PTC Arbortext Layout Developer 12.1.6180/W-x64', 'creationdate': '2023-12-25T16:46:13+05:30', 'title': 'Aversive conditioning increases short-term wariness but does not change habitat use in black bears associated with conflict', 'epsprocessor': 'PStill version 1.84.42', 'author': 'Lori Homstol, Sage Raymond, Claire Edwards, Anthony N. Hamilton, Colleen Cassady St. Clair', 'moddate': '2023-12-25T16:46:13+05:30', 'source': 'hwc\\Homstol et al. 2024.pdf', 'total_pages': 19, 'page': 7, 'page_label': '8'} + +--- Document #5 --- +* Correspondence: B. F. Blackwell, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Animal and +Plant Health Inspection Service, Wildlife Services, National Wildlife Research +Center, Ohio Field Station, Sandusky, OH, 44870, U.S.A. +E-mail address: bradley.f.blackwell@aphis.usda.gov (B. F. Blackwell). +Contents lists available atScienceDirect +Animal Behaviour +journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/anbehav +http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.07.013 +0003-3472/Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. +Animal Behaviour 120 (2016) 245e254 +SPECIAL ISSUE: CONSERVATION BEHAVIOUR + +[Metadata]: {'producer': 'Acrobat Distiller 8.1.0 (Windows)', 'creator': 'Elsevier', 'creationdate': '2016-09-26T20:02:29+05:30', 'crossmarkdomains[2]': 'elsevier.com', 'crossmarkmajorversiondate': '2010-04-23', 'subject': 'Animal Behaviour, 120 (2016) 245-254. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.07.013', 'author': 'Bradley F. Blackwell', 'elsevierwebpdfspecifications': '6.5', 'crossmarkdomainexclusive': 'true', 'robots': 'noindex', 'moddate': '2016-09-26T20:03:01+05:30', 'doi': '10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.07.013', 'crossmarkdomains[1]': 'sciencedirect.com', 'title': 'No single solution: application of behavioural principles in mitigating human-wildlife conflict', 'source': 'hwc\\Blackwell et al. 2016.pdf', 'total_pages': 10, 'page': 0, 'page_label': '245'} ++
+
+Out[54]:
+
+
+<function __main__.test_retriever_only(query: str, k: int = 5)>+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+In [56]:
+
+
+
+
+
+test_query = "If we live in an area with a lot of wolves, what cattle husbandry strategies should I employ to prevent any sort of wildlife-human conflict? Can you check these pdfs to see which ones might help? https://minio.carlboettiger.info/public-data/hwc.zip"
+test_retriever_only(test_query, k=5)
+test_retriever_only
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
++🔍 Query: If we live in an area with a lot of wolves, what cattle husbandry strategies should I employ to prevent any sort of wildlife-human conflict? Can you check these pdfs to see which ones might help? https://minio.carlboettiger.info/public-data/hwc.zip + +📄 Top 5 Retrieved Documents: +------------------------------------------------------------ + +--- Document #1 --- +242 Conflict Intervention Priorities +helps foster more effective collaboration (Game et al. +2013; Lute et al. 2018). Third, both the survey results +and feedback were consistent with recent scholarship +(Redpath et al. 2017) that highlights participatory and +stakeholder-first conflict interventions as best practice +and advocates multipronged (Hazzah et al. 2014) and +adaptive management strategies (Bunnefeld et al. 2017). +Education and awareness programs were often cited in +feedback as being necessary additions to any interven- +tions. However, given the failures of many awareness- +based conservation programs (Schultz 2011), a further +exploration into why and where conservation decision +makers deem them most appropriate is important. Ap- +proaches that are specifically aimed at a particular au- +dience, such as social marketing (Salazar et al. 2018), +may be more effective than simple information provision +or—often-problematic—enforcement (Duffy et al. 2019). +However, how different interventio + +[Metadata]: {'producer': 'Acrobat Distiller 10.1.10 (Windows); modified using iText 4.2.0 by 1T3XT', 'creator': 'LaTeX with hyperref package', 'creationdate': '2020-01-16T12:33:42+05:30', 'keywords': '', 'moddate': '2025-05-27T12:12:25-07:00', 'subject': 'Conservation Biology 2020.34:232-243', 'wps-proclevel': '3', 'wps-journaldoi': '10.1111/(ISSN)1523-1739', 'author': '', 'title': 'Predicting intervention priorities for wildlife conflicts', 'wps-articledoi': '10.1111/cobi.13372', 'source': 'hwc\\Baynham-Herd et al. 2019.pdf', 'total_pages': 12, 'page': 10, 'page_label': '242'} + +--- Document #2 --- +Fig 1. The effects of AC programs on three metrics of black bear wariness, Whistler BC, 2007–2008. A and B show +the average observed percent change in overt reaction distance and displace ment distance among bears in the AC +Group and the Control Group. Error bars represent standard error. C shows the predicted effect of the number of AC +events conduc ted during the previous 30 days on the likeliho od that a bear will flee from research ers prior to their +beginning AC treatm ent. +https://d oi.org/10.1371/j ournal.pon e.0295989.g0 01 +PLOS ONE +Aversive condition ing of conflict black bears +PLOS ONE | https://doi.or g/10.137 1/journal.po ne.02959 89 January 2, 2024 8 / 19 + +[Metadata]: {'producer': 'PDFlib+PDI 9.3.1p2 (C++/Win64)', 'creator': 'PTC Arbortext Layout Developer 12.1.6180/W-x64', 'creationdate': '2023-12-25T16:46:13+05:30', 'title': 'Aversive conditioning increases short-term wariness but does not change habitat use in black bears associated with conflict', 'epsprocessor': 'PStill version 1.84.42', 'author': 'Lori Homstol, Sage Raymond, Claire Edwards, Anthony N. Hamilton, Colleen Cassady St. Clair', 'moddate': '2023-12-25T16:46:13+05:30', 'source': 'hwc\\Homstol et al. 2024.pdf', 'total_pages': 19, 'page': 7, 'page_label': '8'} + +--- Document #3 --- +51] and other carnivores, such as coyotes (Canis latrans) [69, 70], African lions (Panthera leo) +[71], and wolves (Canis lupus) [72]. The relative effectiveness of these AC programs for +increasing wariness could relate to several aspects of program implementation. Because we +subjected bears to aversive stimuli as they engaged in problematic behaviour [48, 50], we +increased the likelihood that bears associated the conditioning stimulus (conflict behaviour) +with the unconditioned stimulus (pain/ stress) [38, 52]. This principle of immediacy in aver- +sive conditioning [54] is not achieved when aversive conditioning occurs upon release of a +captured bear, sometimes hours later and kilometres distant from the capture location where +conflict occurred [32]. Repetition of treatments allowed bears to generalize among experiences +instead of associating the painful stimulus with a single location or human individual, which +has been identified as important to AC programs targeting bold coyotes [69 + +[Metadata]: {'producer': 'PDFlib+PDI 9.3.1p2 (C++/Win64)', 'creator': 'PTC Arbortext Layout Developer 12.1.6180/W-x64', 'creationdate': '2023-12-25T16:46:13+05:30', 'title': 'Aversive conditioning increases short-term wariness but does not change habitat use in black bears associated with conflict', 'epsprocessor': 'PStill version 1.84.42', 'author': 'Lori Homstol, Sage Raymond, Claire Edwards, Anthony N. Hamilton, Colleen Cassady St. Clair', 'moddate': '2023-12-25T16:46:13+05:30', 'source': 'hwc\\Homstol et al. 2024.pdf', 'total_pages': 19, 'page': 12, 'page_label': '13'} + +--- Document #4 --- +3 +Vol.:(0123456789)Scientific RepoRtS | (2020) 10:15341 | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72343-6 +www.nature.com/scientificreports/ +numbers increase and more bears need more food26,43,44. Hence, the effectiveness of anti-bear interventions can +be lower than expected when hungry bears become persistent and more aggressive in damaging behaviour. As +high density may lead to more bears involved in conflicts, it also could increase the demand for bear removal45 +and affect the effectiveness of removal techniques such as translocation and lethal control. +In this paper, we compiled a global database of intervention effectiveness against bears and studied how it +is related to bear species and densities, duration of intervention application, and intervention techniques. We +attempted to find and describe the most effective and the least effective interventions against bears. Further, we +tested several hypotheses: (1) lethal control and invasive management are less effective th + +[Metadata]: {'producer': 'Adobe PDF Library 15.0; modified using iText® 5.3.5 ©2000-2012 1T3XT BVBA (SPRINGER SBM; licensed version)', 'creator': 'Springer', 'creationdate': '2020-09-14T15:09:33+05:30', 'crossmarkdomains[1]': 'springer.com', 'moddate': '2020-09-14T15:58:07+02:00', 'crossmarkmajorversiondate': '2010-04-23', 'subject': 'Scientific Reports, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72343-6', 'author': 'Igor Khorozyan', 'title': 'Variation and conservation implications of the effectiveness of anti-bear interventions', 'crossmarkdomainexclusive': 'true', 'robots': 'noindex', 'doi': '10.1038/s41598-020-72343-6', 'crossmarkdomains[2]': 'springerlink.com', 'source': 'hwc\\Khorozyan and Waltert 2020.pdf', 'total_pages': 9, 'page': 2, 'page_label': '3'} + +--- Document #5 --- +8 + + + + + +Figure A5. Silhouette width plot of the k-medoid partitions with k = 2 to 10 used to estimate the best +number of clusters to describe livestock husbandry systems within the wolf range in northern Portugal +(see the main text for details). + +2 4 6 8 10 +0.20 0.22 0.24 0.26 0.28 0.30 0.32 +Number of clusters +Silhouette Width + +[Metadata]: {'producer': 'PDF Architect 3', 'creator': 'PDF Architect 3', 'creationdate': '2017-01-25T14:50:41+00:00', 'author': 'V. Pimenta', 'moddate': '2017-01-25T14:52:31+00:00', 'source': 'hwc\\Pimenta et al. 2017.pdf', 'total_pages': 20, 'page': 17, 'page_label': '18'} ++
+
+Out[56]:
+
+
+<function __main__.test_retriever_only(query: str, k: int = 5)>+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+In [ ]:
+
+
+
+
+
+
+