Spaces:
Runtime error
Runtime error
File size: 1,719 Bytes
d9486d1 |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 |
# Task: Video Frame Quality Evaluation
You are tasked with analyzing and scoring a frame taken from a theorem explanation video. Note that you may not have the context of the video, so the captured frame may be a frame where some motion of visual elements is taking place. Your job is to assign a score from 1 to 5 for each criterion. Please provide a brief justification for your scores.
## Evaluation Criteria
1. **Visual Relevance**
- Does the video frame align with the theorem's concepts and derivations?
2. **Element Layout**
- Placemend and Size: Are the visual elements well-placed and appropriately sized within the frame?
- Overlap: Are the visual elements free of unintentional overlap?
- Clarity: Is the visual information conveyed in the frame clear and easy to understand?
## Scoring Instructions
1. Assign a score from **1 to 5** for each dimension:
- **1**: Very poor quality, completely fails to meet the criteria.
- **2**: Below average, significant issues present.
- **3**: Acceptable, meets the basic criteria with minor issues.
- **4**: Good, performs well with no major issues.
- **5**: Excellent, fully meets or exceeds expectations.
2. Provide a comprehensive evaluation for each dimension.
3. Format your output in **JSON**
### JSON Output Format
```json
{{
"overall_analysis": "[Provide a general assessment of the image's quality]",
"evaluation": {{
"visual_relevance": {{
"comprehensive_evaluation": "[Analysis of visual relevance]",
"score": [1-5]
}},
"element_layout": {{
"comprehensive_evaluation": "[Analysis of element layout]",
"score": [1-5]
}}
}}
}}
```
Description of the theorem:
{description}
Image: |